User talk:Dianaruttman1

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gumerperu. Thank you. Kinu ^t/_c 07:32, 9 November 2011 (UTC).[reply]

I'm not a sockpuppetry --Dianaruttman1 (talk) 16:05, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl-3.0.html --Dianaruttman1 (talk) 16:28, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gumerperu. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 08:03, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for sockpuppetry. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Kinu ^t/_c 19:32, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dianaruttman1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked indefinitely "without reason"(?). Maybe someone has been able to hack my account, but I have no socks. I need unlocked to provide a neutral and respectful editions of my knowledge on Wikipedia.--Dianaruttman1 (talk) 7:46 am, Today (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

Checkuser confirmed sock. TN X Man 14:13, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Are you sure you want to suggest "without reason"? Both editing with multiple accounts and requesting others to vote/edit similarly through a company, or online boards are both reasons for being blocked. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:06, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

View the full log; the reason why you are blocked reads as "Abusing multiple accounts: blocking indefinitely after second chance". I don't get "someone has been able to hack my account", but whatever. --B music ian 13:23, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]