User talk:Diana He819

Diana He819, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Diana He819! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Polistes versicolor image

Hi Diana. Thank you for your additions to wasp articles. I work with the Wiki Education Foundation, and part of my job is support editors like you with your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you uploaded an image to Commons, File:Screen Shot 2014-10-16 at 10.01.10 AM.png, which you are using in your sandbox article about Polistes versicolor. Unfortunately, if you look at the actual license attached to that image, it's a Creative Commons non-commercial license, which is incompatible with Wikipedia's licensing requirements. (Note that the actual license is CC-NC +, where the + means that you have to ask if you want to use the image commercially. You may want to contact that the owner of the image to see if they might be willing to release it with a more open license. If so, please see c:Commons:OTRS for more information. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:29, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply.

This is one of the areas where copyright gets kind of funny. Using a non-commercial image on Wikipedia wouldn't violate the image copyright, but Wikipedia is designed to be free for anyone to reuse - even commercial users. As a result, 'only on Wikipedia' usage isn't allowed. Commons is meant to be even more stringent in its licensing because files on Commons can be reused by anyone. (On Wikipedia itself there are a limited set of conditions in which non-free material can actually be used - see WP:NFCC if you're interested in knowing more.) Hope this clarifies things a little. The biggest learning curve on Wikipedia tends to be related to copyright - it took me years here to figure out a lot of the nuances - and it stems from the fact that Wikipedia isn't just meant to be an encyclopaedia, it's meant to be a free encyclopaedia, and it has been a major player in the free and open source world. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:45, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know...?

Thank you for your recent contribution to Polistes versicolor.

I wonder if you would like to consider submitting it as a candidate for the "Did you know...?" feature. DYKs (as they are commonly called) are short snippets taken from Wikipedia's newest articles and, if approved, appear on the Main Page. You can learn more about this at Wikipedia:Did you know.

Your article Polistes versicolor appears to meet the criteria for submission as a DYK, but would be greatly improved if you expanded the lead section to briefly summarize the main points of the article. You might also want to add additional wikilinks to other articles in Wikipedia. If you choose to submit a short (and interesting) fact from your article, please read the rules and the supplementary guidelines carefully. Please ask me if you have further questions.

According to the DYK tool, your article was created or expanded on October 16. DYKs must be nominated within 7 days of the creation or 5-fold expansion of the article, so if you choose to submit your article, please act quickly! Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:37, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Satchidananda Panda (April 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikiisawesome was:

A lot of the content here reads like either original research or synthesis of existing sources, both of which are expressly prohibited at Wikipedia, because the article does not frequently enough cite sources. For example, there are almost no references discussing Panda's early life. How is the reader to locate the source of these claims if there are no references? And claims like "A large portion of Satchin's work as a chronobiologist has focused on using mouse models to create a better understanding of the molecular mechanism behind mammalian circadian rhythm" are unsupported by inline citations, meaning that they read like a synthesis of his work. You are allowed to report on what others have written about Panda, or about what Panda has directly written (although this should not be used as the sole basis for finding notability). But you cannot interpret and synthesize existing sources when writing the article. I hope this distinction makes sense. If you have questions, please feel free to ask at my talk page. Thanks,

You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Satchidananda Panda and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

wia (talk) 20:15, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]