User talk:DiSchamelrider
Your GA nomination of Middle Stone Age
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Middle Stone Age you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 3family6 -- 3family6 (talk) 03:20, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Middle Stone Age
[edit]The article Middle Stone Age you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Middle Stone Age for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 3family6 -- 3family6 (talk) 18:20, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Middle Stone Age
[edit]The article Middle Stone Age you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Middle Stone Age for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 3family6 -- 3family6 (talk) 17:01, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Southeastern Ceremonial Complex
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Southeastern Ceremonial Complex you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rationalobserver -- Rationalobserver (talk) 22:00, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello! I haven't heard from you in almost a week, so I'll put the GAN on hold for now, but if you don't respond soon I'll have to fail the nom, which would be a shame. Rationalobserver (talk) 18:59, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
I see now that you haven't edited since December 10, 2014, so I'm going to fail the GAN. If you resume editing please feel free to re-nom the article. Rationalobserver (talk) 23:01, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Southeastern Ceremonial Complex
[edit]The article Southeastern Ceremonial Complex you nominated as a good article has failed 
; see Talk:Southeastern Ceremonial Complex for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rationalobserver -- Rationalobserver (talk) 23:21, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)