User talk:Dhairikfuletra

Proposed deletion of Think again conclave

Hello, Dhairikfuletra. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Think again conclave, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:46, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:ThinkAgainLogo.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ThinkAgainLogo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:23, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Think Again Conclave for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Think Again Conclave is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Think Again Conclave until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Soni (talk) (Previously TheOriginalSoni) 09:24, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Where to respond

If you want to argue in favor of keeping Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Think Again Conclave, you should post there, not at my page. There, you should argue how it meets our policies, namely Wikipedia:Notability (events) or Wikipedia:Notability (organizations) . Please keep in mind that Wikipedia is not a repository of pages on topics that are useful, nor is it goal to help in promotion of anything, even if it would be a non-profit educational endeavor. See also: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, WP:ITSUSEFUL. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:03, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this recent edit to Think Again Conclave, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. PhantomTech (talk) 04:01, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Think Again Conclave. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Redtigerxyz ^Talk 11:27, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Think Again Conclave, BITS Pilani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Think Again Conclave, BITS Pilani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Think Again Conclave, BITS Pilani until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Soni (talk) 23:53, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines, as you did at Think Again Conclave, BITS Pilani. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Paul McDonald (talk) 12:39, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]