User talk:Dgjesquire

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Dgjesquire, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! My76 Strat 10:13, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead.

Using detailed edit summaries is the best way to ensure that your good faith edits are not reverted by recent changes patrollers or other wikieditors. Thanks and happy editing! — Spike Toronto 21:51, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dgjesquire. Just a short note to let you know that you don't have to sign edit summaries with four tildes (~~~~), as they don't work the same way as when a talk page discusssion is signed with ~~~~. Best. Ward20 (talk) 21:15, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mercedes-Benz SL-Class

Hi DGJ. I reverted this edit because “al fresco” is gilding the lilly (see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (words to watch) (shortcut → WP:WORDS)) and is clearly understood by the use of the word roadster. Also, “less costly” requires a verifiable reference/citation. Thanks! — Spike Toronto 21:56, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. You should review an article’s edit history when editing to read the edit summaries to see why edits are reverted/changed/etc. This prevents endless reverts and edit wars Thanks! — Spike Toronto 22:03, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

P.P.S. To learn how to add verifiable references/citations to articles, have a look at Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners (shortcut → WP:REFBEGIN). Have fun! — Spike Toronto 22:08, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dgjesquire. You have new messages at SpikeToronto's talk page.
Message added 01:47, 27 December 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

— Spike Toronto 01:47, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Earth Stove

Hi! I just spotted User:Dgjesquire/Earth Stove and wondered if you were thinking of moving it to article space some time. Thanks! -- Trevj (talk) 11:10, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Trevj: Greetings yourself. On the article, it would be my first submittal, so I was frankly shy about posting it. It is basically ready but I don't have the time to take it to the next step, if that's warranted.

My two uncles [both living] are the founders of the company so I have information just, well, from the 'family archives', if you will.

If you have some interest in helping take it thru the next steps, I'd be interested in hearing how you would, and assist it to the space; to make it not appear as 'commercial'. It is not intended that in any way.

Indeed, the brand has been absorbed into one of the industry giants and they [uncles] have been out of managing it for decades, now.

My intent only is to get their contribution into the 'world repository'. They are not interested in the 'net, so this [my effort] seemed the sole route toward that. Nor would they be vain enough to make the endeavor.

If you can help, I'd gladly welcome your expertise.

Thanks for the useful info. We're mostly all here to build the encyclopedia and (without doing any further research) your justification sounds fine in principle. The "Your first article" link (above in the welcome message) should provide some useful info. Two of the main issues will be notability and your conflict of interest (which is fine if stated) - minor style issues could be addressed once the article is in the main encyclopedia namespace. I'll try to have a look at it some time soon. But you could also take your questions to the Teahouse. Cheers. -- Trevj (talk) 15:00, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Dgjesquire, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! -- Trevj (talk) 15:01, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]