User talk:Dgabbard

Welcome!

Hello, Dgabbard, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ~~~~; this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Katr67 01:02, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cheese in Sunnyside

Your edits about the cheese production in Sunnyside seems to be a commercial. I'm not saying you're a sock puppet or you did a dishonest edit, but it looks like that. FYI, I consider Sunnyside to be my home town (I was born in Richland which was the nearest hospital at the time) so I want to see this article to stay as clean as possible. Entries about the commercial aspects of Sunnyside are ok, but when the Commercial section basically plugs one company and one product, I have to weigh in. If your intentions are honest, keep on editing. My preference is for us to discuss the section of SUNNYSIDE COMMERCE on the Sunnyside DISCUSSION page before editing. -- A Kamiakin alum from the 60's, Quartermaster (talk) 02:29, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Check out the current state of the Sunnyside article. I created a new section, "Attractions and events" and put in a section on the cheese factory. Feel free to dive in and edit and expand, especially the cheese factory part. I'm having problems with developing an "economy" section, mostly because we both know Sunnyside proper doesn't have much of an economy (more properly part of the larger Yakima Valley economy). -- Quartermaster (talk) 22:56, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

John Stanley

On 27 May, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article John Stanley, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 07:05, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Little Lulu (which as a boy I read in Spanish) is my favorite comic and I still love it. Do you know if there's a color reprint of at least some of the series? —Cesar Tort 14:58, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dark Horse did one color special as part of their recent reprinting. http://www.darkhorse.com/profile/profile.php?sku=13-972 Dgabbard (talk) 21:50, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK on of WE Seal of approval program

*... that between 1970 and 1984 the WE Seal of approval program aided in an estimated $100,000 in restitution being made to collectors of comics and other memorabilia victimized by mail fraud? -- new article, self nom by Dgabbard (talk) 02:58, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'm new at this so pardon any error of judgment, but I'm pretty sure that a Sequential Tarts column by a Katherine Keller and this weblink of Ron Frantz's book do not comply with WP:RS. While pages and publication details from Frantz's book are provided, you will need to remove the questionable sites and bring in more reliable sources to support the hook and the overall article. Vishnava_talk 15:05, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you have any questions or comments regarding this, please post them at T:TDYK next to your nom and my review, so everybody can be aware of the issue. Vishnava_talk 15:09, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your feelings; its natural to be miffed at criticism of your hard work, but your experience in this field and subject is not what has been questioned. I am only stressing the importance of every article going up on the main page as DYK to comply with WP:RS. I said before that I could be wrong, so let's leave it to another examiner to give a more definitive opinion. Vishnava_talk 17:05, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just make sure that the key facts mentioned in the nomination statement (a.k.a the "hook") are cited by WP:RS-compliant sources. Then you shouldn't have any problems, Vishnava_talk 17:07, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It comes from the Frantz book, so that isn't a problem.Dgabbard (talk) 01:37, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

6/5 DYK

On 5 June, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article WE Seal of approval program, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Bedford ^Pray 01:33, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re

About the {{onesource}} tag on WE Seal of Approval: I didn't put the tag there to challenge the article or anything, just to point out that there is only one source and it would be nice to add more. That doesn't have anything to with whether or not it was accepted for DYK in the past; it's only a cleanup tag. Sometimes it's ok to call a spade a spade.

As for Herb Ringer, I haven't reviewed it yet because I personally think it still needs more cleanup (cleanup that I'm not really capable of doing), but I don't think it technically fails any explicit DYK rules; I haven't re-reviewed it myself because I would still be disinclined to pass it, but it wouldn't be fair of me to fail it just because I'm not yet satisfied with the cleanup, so I've been letting it sit there and waiting for someone else who's more impartial to come along and review it. Best, —Politizer ^talk/_contribs 07:30, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Herb Ringer: copyright violation

Much of what you put in Herb Ringer seems to come more or less directly from a web page that can be viewed here. This appears to violate the copyright of the author or publisher. (An additional problem is that this page seems unreliable.) Please quickly remove material taken from that web page, or else the article will be deleted. -- Hoary (talk) 02:09, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Copyright holder has given me permission. Do you want me to document that? Dgabbard (talk) 21:35, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On further reflection, I feel I have stayed within the bounds of fair use but that some edits need to be made (regretfully the information on the camera and color film should have been double-checked and I intend to remove it) which I hope to do in the next few days. Hope that addresses the concerns. Dgabbard (talk) 23:46, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid we disagree on whether this is "fair use". But that's one issue. And it's an issue that becomes a non-issue if the copyright holder gives permission for unlimited reuse; on this, please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. Meanwhile, I'll alter what's written about camera and film. -- Hoary (talk) 00:41, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Herb Ringer. -- Hoary (talk) 00:51, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please revisit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Herb Ringer. -- Hoary (talk) 23:09, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mickey Mouse (comics)

Hello! Nice to see someone else working on this article! Although I've read a certain amount about the history (partly through the editorializing in Gladstone MM), I did not feel comfortable presenting a comprehensive view. I look forward to seeing what else you have to add. Regards, Alpha Ralpha Boulevard (talk) 11:47, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Hope over time to continue refining it. When I started last year it had very little but over time we have managed to make it more substantial. Dgabbard (talk) 16:26, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More compliments for your most recent changes. Carefully not showing any bias here (ha, ha, ha) it's nice to see one of the major cultural influences on American children for decades get comprehensive treatment — when compared to the endless superhero titles. I doubt people understand 50 years on that MM wasn't just another of dozens of titles on the rack. Cheers, Alpha Ralpha Boulevard (talk) 05:26, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happily over time more information is emerging so we can flesh out the history of this material. In its heyday these titles vastly outsold the superheroes and everything else on the news-stands. Dgabbard (talk) 16:12, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, agreed. The cultural legacy is an important aspect to this.

Also you will be interested in this discussion that just opened Alpha Ralpha Boulevard (talk) 01:37, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary for your edits. Thank you. Omarcheeseboro (talk) 18:10, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wally Wood

Certainly, and thank you for asking. Blogs are disallowed as reference sources per WP:SPS, the policy on self-published sources. Exceptions are made for online newspaper/magazine columns, which though called blogs have editorial oversight or a mainstream reliable-source publication's imprimatur. A subject's own blog can be used in an article about the subject himself, and in certain cases a recognized authority with established publication credentials in a specific field may be cited, but fan or hobbyist blogs aren't allowed by Wikipedia policy.

There are many times I've wanted to reference a blog that looks authoritative, but there's no way to prove that what such a blog contains is true or accurate, and when quoting dead people, that's a big red flag.

I hope this helps. In the long run, the policy of WP:SPS is the safest way to help insure credibility, without which Wikipedia would not be taken as a reliable, authoritative reference source. With regards, --Tenebrae (talk) 22:17, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

John Ehrlichman

I rolled back your additions. The first addition needs a source, the second one was pure editorial. You're going nto need a decent source to put that assessment in and it should be phrased differently to maintain NPOV. --WGFinley (talk) 05:39, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I redid the addition merely noting the book and its serving as the basis for a miniseries with citation to the IMDB entry verifying that fact. And I think it now maintains NPOV. And I was in part fulfilling the request of the entry for the book seeking more links--doesn't it make sense to have the author's entry link to a book they wrote that evidently was a success and spawned a media adaptation?Dgabbard (talk) 01:01, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Much better! Thanks. --WGFinley (talk) 02:29, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Margie Hines

I've not going to revert your addition to this article, but it would be good if you had a citation for it. Do you think you can add one? Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:44, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! I added a citation to a 1939 Milestones column in Time Magazine that announced the marriage. Nobody seems quite sure when the divorce happened beyond it was a mere few years later. Hines wasn't even mentioned in Mercer's New York Times obituary! Dgabbard (talk) 01:11, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that's great ! Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:21, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Lichtenstein Quarter-Ring Sidewalk Circus

First, thanks for your fantastic work on Barnum's Kaleidoscape. Well-sourced, informative, and a great article all around. Kudos.

It's hard to be sure without footage or a reference with a more thorough description of the performances, but your addition of the Royal Lichtenstein Quarter-Ring Sidewalk Circus to Contemporary circus as an example of the genre sticks out for a couple reasons. One is that I hadn't ever heard mention of the troupe in my studies of nouveau cirque, so it immediately seemed odd to see it listed alongside Circus Oz and Cirque Plume and the Pickle Family Circus. And once I read the blog description you provided as a reference and some other online sources, it really doesn't sound like a typical example of contemporary circus at all, keeping in mind that "contemporary circus" isn't just a synonym for "recent circus", but is an artistic genre with a particular set of aesthetic parameters. For example, animal performers are typically largely absent, while Lichtenstein apparently featured animal performers rather prominently. Theatricality, use of music to evoke a range of moods, and a character-driven narrative are other key elements of the contemporary circus. From what I have been able to find online, Lichtenstein sounds a lot more like a street theatre company that drew from elements of traditional circus to create a small-scale sense of spectacle; and if there was a narrative, it sounds like it was mostly in service of a Christian message rather than an immersive aesthetic experience.

If Lichtenstein thought of itself as contemporary circus, from what I've read it sounds like a very atypical instance of the genre. I would be forced to question its notability within that movement without a better reference. Do you have inside knowledge or access to another reference that might give a clearer picture of their performances? Or can I remove it from the list for now? AtticusX (talk) 00:52, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My motivation was a friend said my Kaleidoscape entry made it sound like it drew some inspiration from Royal Lichtenstein. That motivated adding it to the contemporary circus entry. But your comments make a good argument for it being more street theater, albeit somewhat organized (evidently in a season they would visit 200+ campuses going across the U.S.). I wouldn't object if you removed it. I've actually made a few notes and hope to eventually work up an entry on the show. Evidently several performers got their start there. And thanks for the kind words in re the Barnum's Kaleidoscape entry. Dgabbard (talk) 18:37, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have now created an entry for the Royal Lichtenstein Quarter-Ring Sidewalk Circus.Dgabbard (talk) 03:08, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating this. The article looks great to me. AtticusX (talk) 19:47, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Barnum's Kaleidoscape

On 29 October 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Barnum's Kaleidoscape, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 06:02, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Royal Lichtenstein Quarter-Ring Sidewalk Circus

On 16 November 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Royal Lichtenstein Quarter-Ring Sidewalk Circus, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Royal Lichtenstein Quarter-Ring Sidewalk Circus was a ministry of the California Jesuits? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 18:07, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Sorry for the confusion! TRLIJC19 (talk) 15:47, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Toni Mendez.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Cheers! Stella ^BATPHONE _GROOVES 06:13, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Toni Mendez.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Phantomwiki (talk) 00:59, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Toni Mendez, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 23:56, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Disney comics may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

to sell a strip titled ''Mr. George's Wife'').<ref>Floyd Gottfredso Library 1, may 2011.</ref>) with art by [[Ub Iwerks]].
] (Mickey Mouse, Uncle Remus), [[Bob Karp]] (Donald Duck, Merry Menagerie), [[Carl Fallberg]] (Treasury of Classic Tales, holiday], Frank Reilly (Treasury of Classic Tales, holiday), Milt Banta (Mickey Mouse and His Friends), Roy

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:15, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed it. Dgabbard (talk) 17:43, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Dgabbard. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Dgabbard. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cartoon Teletales has been accepted

Cartoon Teletales, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

– Broccoli & Coffee ^{(Oh hai)} 01:17, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

===Thanks for the input. I added a section on creators involved with the show who went on to have significant careers in entertainment to illustrate the notability of the show and enhanced the entry beyond stub status. Dgabbard (talk) 03:26, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wichita (1955 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New Yorker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dgabbard. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dgabbard. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Underdog (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Arnold (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:50, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alley Oop, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dark Horse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:13, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Stanley (cartoonist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New Yorker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 6

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Banacek

added links pointing to Jock, Beacon Hill, Touch football and Weekend warrior

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:56, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Thanks for bringing to my attention. Dgabbard (talk) 15:35, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]