User talk:Dexter Nextnumber

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Dexter Nextnumber! I am Airplaneman and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Airplaneman ^talk 04:39, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Try Google ;) Airplaneman ^talk 06:00, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you should? It's your article. I will enjoy reading up on whatever you come up with, though. :)

Not really... ;) Airplaneman ^talk 23:34, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Transmigration (novel)

A tag has been placed on Transmigration (novel) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ContinueWithCaution (talk) 02:16, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Transmigration (novel)

The article Transmigration (novel) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Short article lacking proof of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ContinueWithCaution (talk) 02:17, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anima (novel)

The article Anima (novel) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned, unreferenced article. Lacks coverage in 3rd party sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 15:51, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The General Zapped an Angel

The article The General Zapped an Angel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent indication of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shadowjams (talk) 13:25, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Called out

I'd prefer your input here. —Aladdin Sane (talk) 01:06, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Operating system parking and citations

I'm Cpiral. Glad to meet ya. Saw your WWW page about your WP stats. Cool.

I was just redressing operating system and thought ya might like to comment about the major-changing realities on the discussion page. For example, I now want to move Commodore to computer networks. Thing is, I have to wonder about some of the content of that move, as my edit to that other article will have my name on it. :-) It needs citation. Check it out now that I've added {{tl:citation needed}} templates. And as an editor of OS, do comment on the changes there if you have time.

Thanks! — Cpiral Cpiral 02:37, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image of file describing CBM Kernal Jump Table uploaded to Wiki Commons

People who like to track Dexter Nextnumber around Wikipedia will probably want to examine the jpeg below. If you think this fits into his user page, or somewhere else, let him know.

Dexter Nextnumber (talk) 22:19, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

commodore has neither API or boot blocks

Impossible. — Cpiral Cpiral 02:17, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Commodore 1541 operating system, for instance, is not the same thing as the Commodore 64 operating system, and neither of them has a "boot block" or - as I understand it - API. But if I am just not "getting it", that is because, perhaps, I just don't understand the term "API" right? By the way, I'd rather keep the discussion over at Talk:operating system instead of over here. Dexter Nextnumber (talk) 03:56, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Response on talk:Prime_number

From your response on the talk page of Prime number I understand you are not interested in good relations with me and have therefore removed my response to your question on my user talk page. Dmcq (talk) 09:50, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Transmigration (novel)

I have nominated Transmigration (novel), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transmigration (novel). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Mm40 (talk) 22:11, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Dexter Nextnumber. You have new messages at Sligocki's talk page.
Message added 04:49, 10 January 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

— sligocki (talk) 04:49, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The General Zapped an Angel

The article The General Zapped an Angel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent indication of notability, unreferenced.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MuffledThud (talk) 22:00, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Commodore's Catastrophic Lack of Direction

The article Commodore's Catastrophic Lack of Direction has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Title conveys strong point of view per WP:NPOV, unreferenced.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MuffledThud (talk) 22:12, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've contested the proposed deletion on Commodore's Catastrophic Lack of Direction, asking for a redirect instead. It doesn't seem likely to me that anyone would be searching Wikipedia for those words, and as was noted in the prod, the title itself conveys a strong point of view, in breach of the policy of WP:NPOV. The article as it stands is basically a very short essay with a strongly POV conclusion for its title per Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought and Wikipedia:No original research, asking other editors to contribute evidence supporting the essay's conclusion. Would you like to rename and improve it, or do you really want to send this through the WP:AFD process? Thanks, MuffledThud (talk) 08:51, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What would you like it be renamed as? Dexter Nextnumber (talk) 20:37, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dexter Nextnumber. You have new messages at Talk:Commodore's Catastrophic Lack of Direction.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Dexter Nextnumber! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 317 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Eileen-Marie Duell Buchanan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:48, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FP on 8-bits

I've left a little ramble at Talk:Atari BASIC, with little detail, but would happily go into more depth if I can help out in any way. I've been kinda embroiled with FP one way or another for over 20 years so although no expert on the theory I kinda know my way around it a bit, so any little tidbits I can give you, I would be happy to.

The implementatation of long doubles on SGI machines is bizarre! And it has its NaNs the wrong way round (signaling vs. quiet ones).

S.

Speedy deletion nomination of Lisa Raye (musician)

A tag has been placed on Lisa Raye (musician) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Winner 42 ( Talk to me! ) 22:07, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of LisaRaye McCoy-Mistick

A tag has been placed on LisaRaye McCoy-Mistick requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 21:54, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

General discussion on article talk pages

I've noticed you contribute a lot of discussion on article talk pages. However, article talk pages are not for general discussion about the topic. They should be used explicitly for discussion on improving the articles. I have removed your addition to the talk page for Nadya Suleman as you mentioned the article exactly zero times, let alone talked about how the information you were presenting and the question you were asking could benefit the article. If you want to chit-chat about the topic, please take it to an outside forum or message board, as that material is not appropriate here. Thanks. --13² 17:16, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What on earth are you talking about? --13² 13:49, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Snow White and the Giants

The article Snow White and the Giants has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable novel

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 00:53, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Isaac's Universe

The article Isaac's Universe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) supplementary essay. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:42, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]