User talk:DevilInk5
Speedy deletion nomination of EvoGames
[edit]Hello DevilInk5,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged EvoGames for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ita140188 (talk) 05:21, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article EvoGames is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EvoGames until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – czar 14:59, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
October 2015
[edit]
Hello, I'm Cannolis. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of blogs, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cannolis (talk) 10:03, 31 October 2015 (UTC)