User talk:Develmax

November 2017

Microsoft Office

Hello, Jackfork! I thought you were a bot. Since when was it (Wikitext) not a constructive act? Reading Wikipedia, I noticed that the Microsoft Office page says about Office Open XML, but there is no link to this article. I checked that it is valid, therefore, for the convenience of reading, a link is needed, so that you can go to the given term with one click and continue, nezhele use the search, spending for this time. After all, Wikipedia is a semantic network and it was created for comfortable reading and saving time. Please, return my edit to the place. Develmax (talk) 10:54, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In practice only the first mention is linked. If you check there are at least two linked. One in the infobox and one at the beginning of the article. Jackfork (talk) 18:05, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Zing

Please note that disambiguation pages like Zing are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory

Perhaps you could add the reference to the Zing entry in Model checking instead. Leschnei (talk) 12:59, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]