User talk:Deunick

Hello,

Thanks for visiting my Page. I am not a biggy about a " Talk" Page. Please however do not edit this in any risk or any way possible or I will be doing the same to your WALL!

Please do not post things your having no idea about! This will result in my coming back at your with a none happy message!

WIKIPEDIA IS FREE! WE DO NOT NEED TERRIBLE PEOPLE WHO DO NOT MAKE THE WORLD MAKE IT LOOK BAD!

Deunick (talk) 22:09, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA reviews

I know you are aware that your GA reviews have been questioned. The consensus is that they are not following our criteria and all of them have to be restarted. This is creating work for other editors. Can you please stop reviewing articles until you become more experienced with the processes here. I suggest you work to improve some of our poorer articles for a while to gain this experience (there are many to choose from Category:Articles needing cleanup). AIRcorn (talk) 00:05, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of EnrichedWorld

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on EnrichedWorld requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. TheGrappler (talk) 20:21, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately the article as it was written failed section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion in my opinion, and the opinion of the deleting administrator. [is a good guide] to writing your first article, that I hope will be useful to you in future efforts. TheGrappler (talk) 06:10, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"EnrichedWorld is a new company. There is not to much history based on it." That is one of the problems with your article. Are there reliable sources you can base an article on? (Have a good read of WP:RS, which is an excellent guide to this problem.) And does EnrichedWorld pass the criteria at WP:N (and WP:CORP) to have a Wikipedia article? TheGrappler (talk) 20:18, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jango "multiple issues" tag removal

Hi Deunick. As a fan of Jango myself, I can understand and appreciate you not wanting to see the "multiple issues" box at the top of the page. However, the issues it mentions are legitimate problems with the article that still need to be addressed, so I have reinstated the multiple issues tag that you removed. Cheers, CurtBennett (talk) 18:48, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry can you put that into logical terms. I am only editing the ALEXA rank. I am doing what Pandora does and there is logically nothing incorrect over that. I have added a few times a if and and but nothing to striking. Please look at the talk page thank you Deunick (talk) 22:08, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the ALEXA edits you made and I don't see any problem with those, but one of your edits also removed the "multiple issues" tag from the page. It sounds like you did it by accident, so don't worry. I just wanted to let you know that I put the tag back because it shouldn't have been removed. You can see the change I'm referring to if you click the "View history" tab on the Jango (website) article. Cheers, CurtBennett (talk) 20:03, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations \| June 2022 Backlog Drive
On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Nicki Minaj

Nicki Minaj has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. PHShanghai | they/them (talk) 10:39, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]