User talk:Deucaon

Deucaon, please believe me when I say that I mean no ill-will when I edit the Chetniks article. Once again I would like to ask you to discuss your edit instead of simply reverting out of hand, its not the way things are done on Wikipedia. Simply reverting is the best way to end up in a revert-war. regards --DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 09:08, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The picture has no relevance and you changed a number of other things as well - Deucaon.

The picture has no relevance? It is the flag of the Chetnik movement that's been used during WW2, that's been established a long time ago. The flag you're using is the Yugoslav naval ensign, its has no relevance. Let me point out once more that the flag of a movement is not the flag of the country it owed its allegiance to. (See: Partisan flag [1], and SFR Yugoslav flag [2].)

As for the Chetnik/Axis pic, it certainly has relevance. It does not prove anything, yes, but it shows Chetniks so it should be on the Chetniks article. The pictiure's addition is in accordance with policy, you cannot just remove pictures you don't like that is a violation of WP:VAN. --DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 09:34, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 14:29, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WARNING

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Chetniks. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 10:16, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please note that the appropriate place to discuss difflcuties in articles is the talk page of the article itself. Repeatedly removing content or engaging in revert wars may lead to a block of your account. You are urged to engage in dialogue on the talk page of the article. Please note that continued edit warring without discussion will lead to a removal of editing privelidges. Pedro : Chat 10:46, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --Kukini ^{háblame aquí} 23:42, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Chetniks, you will be blocked from editing. --DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 16:23, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I

Hi Deucaon. There is an AN/I thread that directly concerns you. See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Deucaon. Regards, AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 16:56, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Tan | 39 17:10, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]