User talk:Detah

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Detah! I am Marek69 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Marek.69 ^talk 20:39, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

re: your message

Hi Detah, I've left a reply to your message on my talk page -- Marek.69 ^talk 23:26, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Social liberalism

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Social liberalism. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. TFD (talk) 15:39, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree that with your contention that it is unconstructive. It is not only constructive, it is a correction of facts. Liberalism is being painted as a centrist philosophy with this sentence. Liberalism is by definition the left of the political spectrum. To state otherwise is simply false. I would like to appeal your reverting of this article. How does one go about that? Detah (talk) 15:45, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you read the welcoming information supplied to you above, you will see that sources are required for changes, and our personal definitions are not acceptable for editing articles. You should also read both the Social liberalism and Liberalism articles in order to understand the subject matter, as you appear not understand these concepts. TFD (talk) 16:30, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So the issue here is sources? I thought you claimed that my correction was vandalism. I can provide sources. That is a simple matter. Thanks for the reply. Detah (talk) 16:42, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]