User talk:Desmond.andrewson

Welcome!

Hello, Desmond.andrewson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Sustainable Lens, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! reddogsix (talk) 01:44, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sustainable Lens

The article Sustainable Lens has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable radio show. Article lacks non-trivial secondary references.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 01:44, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sustainable Lens for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sustainable Lens is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sustainable Lens until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 02:38, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have commented that you are seeking guidance regarding suitable sources for Sustainable Lens. Please read WP:RS, Wikipedia's guidance regarding reliable sources. Basically, we're looking for evidence of significant coverage in sources independent of the topic. So, regional or national magazines, newspapers, etc. But local coverage generally isn't considered significant unless there is evidence of many separate instances of such local coverage. The guidelines at WP:GNG should help. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 04:15, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks WikiDan61 - I'll work in on that. 05:23, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sustainable Lens may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

means to see the world through a sustainable perspective, through their sustainable lens. To date (August 2014, this archive contains 176 hour long interviews.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:05, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Desmond.andrewson. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 19:24, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]