User talk:DesertAngel

Welcome!

Hello, DesertAngel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Good job

Thanks for adding references to Abbey Lincoln. Your work is much appreciated. Rl 11:23, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh wow, thank you for noticing. I'm glad I was able to help out :-) DesertAngel 15:52, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good work

On patrolling the recent edits page I'm noticing your name handing out warnings and reverting vandalism. A cookie for you!

Compwhiz II 02:33, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, thank you! :) DesertAngel (talk) 02:34, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, great work. And thanks for reverting the vandalism an anonymous user did to my user page. Here, you look hungry enough. Have another cookie. Doczilla (talk) 12:33, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

YAY! I HAVE COOKIES!! DesertAngel (talk) 17:00, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Custom Signatures

Yes enter this:

 [[User:DesertAngel|<span style="color:#FF823D;font-family: Monotype Corsiva">'''<font color="#880088">De<font color="#0000FF">se<font color="#449900">rt<font color="#DD9922">A<font color="#DD4400">ng<font color="#BB0000">el</font>''']]

into that box and check raw signature. If you still have problems tell me. Compwhiz II 21:21, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Now you made me fix mine :D Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 21:38, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

( It's still having problems... It's telling me that the html code is invalid. I guess I just have to play with it. DesertAngel (talk) 22:55, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good to see its working Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 02:33, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for catching that vandalism. Much appreciated. Bagheera (talk) 03:06, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to help :) DesertAngel 03:10, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome

Ther are a lot of vandals out tonight. Corvus cornix_talk 05:52, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of request for deletion of editor DesertAngel :)

DesertAngel, the editor you are, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that you satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space. Your opinions on yourself are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at User:GlassCobra/Editor for deletion#DesertAngel and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit during the discussion but should not remove the nomination (unless you wish not to participate); such removal will not end the deletion discussion (actually it will). Thank you, and have a good sense of humor :).

HAPPY 1000!

User:Compwhizii/Happy1000mes

Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For your anti-vandal efforts, fighting the good fight! Keep up the great work! Jmlk 1 7 06:52, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy?

There. I finally got a signature that makes my account look unique and isn't loud and disruptive like yours :) Trusilver 18:03, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi, sorry for vandalising, i know it sounds stupid but if i actually thought my vandal edit would not be soon reverted i wouldn't have done it because i don't want to harm this great project, but then thinking about it, by vandalising i am consuming the time of good editors of the project like yourself and thus also harming the project, so, to cut a long story short, i'm sorry, and having thought through my actions, i promise i won't do it again. P.S. sorry to read of your illness(?), it was a heart warming story tbh and i'm delighted that on the internet and WP you don't face the communication barriers that you must otherwise encounter in daily life. Sorry for being a pain, and keep up the good work! ;) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.77.168.8 (talk) 05:03, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay. How about you contribute to the project instead of vandalizing? We have a pretty fun time around here and you are welcome to be a part of it. :) DesertAngel 05:06, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation pages

I'm glad I could be an inspiration :) I've actually finished the Q's now, as well as the P's (there weren't very many Q's, and I've started the R's.

This is the type of editing I like doing, as it's fast and results in few edit conflicts, 98% of my edits stick without being reverted (and the ones that get reverted, if I notice them, I explain the manual of style page to the reverter and they give in).

I suggest that, in your edit summaries, you might want to include a link to Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages), as this will decrease the number of people who revert your edits. Many people otherwise will have no idea why you removed so many of the lovely blue links from their favorite disambiguation page. --Xyzzyplugh (talk) 20:56, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Baarle

Why dit you remove the link to the Drongen Baarle? Because it is a red link?

The avoiding of red links, together with the references and sources (what a fuss!) has become a real cancer on the English Wikipedia. I do not say this to you only but to this whole community. The English Wikipedia community seems to have forgotten that red links form the engine of a Wikipedia!

Greetings, Belgian man (talk) 20:39, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Drongen Baarle I left, the other one, the one under "see also" I didn't. According to the manual of style, redlinks do not belong on disambiguation pages if the only link is to the disambiguation page itself. DesertAngel 03:21, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I didn't know this rule. Belgian man (talk) 12:39, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of an article to which you contributed

Proposed deletion of Abaaba National Park

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Abaaba National Park, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. T L Miles (talk) 03:18, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not another cheap christmas wishes!

	Merry Christmas to you!
	Have a very merry Christmas and Frosted christcakes! And a great new year! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Regards (and Season's Greetings!) from --Mixwell!^Talk 13:44, 20 December 2008 (UTC) [reply]

NO U

NO U!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.107.128.223 (talk) 09:41, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Smile!

Hello DesertAngel, Thesevenseas has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Set Sail For The Seven Seas 320° 21' 15" NET 21:21, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Abby Hagyard

An editor has nominated Abby Hagyard, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abby Hagyard and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 21:46, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Hi DesertAngel!

I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!

It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!

Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!

Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 16:23, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWomen's Collaborative

WikiWomen Unite!

Hi DesertAngel! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative.

As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:

Liking the WikiWomen's Collaborative on Facebook and share your tips, projects, and connect with other WikiWomen
Join the conversation on our Twitter feed
Reading and writing for our blog channel

We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can get involved!

Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 04:12, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWomen's Collaborative: Come join us (and check out our new website)!

WikiWomen - We need you!

Hi DesertAngel! The WikiWomen's Collaborative is a group of women from around the world who edit Wikipedia, contribute to its sister projects, and support the mission of free knowledge. We recently updated our website, created new volunteer positions, and more!

Get involved by:

Visiting our website for resources, events, and more
Meet other women and share your story in our profile space
Participate at and "like" our Facebook group
Join the conversation on our Twitter feed
Reading and writing for our blog channel
Volunteer to write for our blog, recruit blog writers, translate content, and co-run our Facebook and receive perks for volunteering
Already participating? Take our survey and share your experience!

Thanks for editing Wikipedia, and we look forward to you being a part of the Collaborative! -- EdwardsBot (talk) 00:37, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]