User talk:DescribeAPlague

Waiting for help.DescribeAPlague (talk) 03:50, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Your request

Thanks for coming to me. As DrKiernan was the editor who nominated me for adminship and is someone whom I've worked with, I think it woul be best if you sought help from someone else. I do not say I could not be neutral regarding him, I simply prefer not to. I have left word at AN/I (see this diff for another admin to help out here. Many thanks,--Wehwalt (talk) 07:15, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Blocked as sock

Blocked, as a sock, [1]. Please make unblock requests, at the talk page of the master account. Thanks, -- Cirt (talk) 07:42, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Response: Well, I am need of guidance there. To begin with, there is absolutely no call for the block in the 1st place. As user ElKeKomeIKanta, I was forced to re-register just to be able to post anything: I was blocked from my own discussion page. There is no way--I think you saw to this--that I could post anything anywhere, again! It's a miracle I can post here. I am aware of Kiernan's reach and power, so when I asked for help, the admin refuses due to his love for K. Now how do I do this?DescribeAPlague (talk) 11:32, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

And I wish to add, the admin DrKiernan has stepped far out of bounds, attempting to 'out' me as another user, invoking another username which shows how he operates when it comes to those who dissent. There is no call, no evidence, for such a cruel and disabling tactic on the part of the admins here.DescribeAPlague (talk) 11:34, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Some bastard named Trusilver has even re-activated the username RevAntonio, so I see now how the pack has moved in on me, to tar & feather me. And I know of some of Trusilver's history with the problem subject that has caused all this. Now it is awaited for me to make a statement that is deemed to break some other rule. THAT is the only reason I am able to post right here only.God, what hateful and dishonest people you all are. How do I appeal THIS?DescribeAPlague (talk) 11:47, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Definitions for consideration

This should be recognizable:

"A sockpuppet is an online identity used for purposes of deception within an online community. In its earliest usage, a sockpuppet was a false identity through which a member of an Internet community speaks with or about himself or herself, pretending to be a different person,[1] like a ventriloquist manipulating a hand puppet.

In current usage, the perception of the term has been extended beyond second identities of people who already post in a forum or blog to include other uses of misleading online identities. For example, a New York Times article claims that "sockpuppeting" is defined as "the act of creating a fake online identity to praise, defend or create the illusion of support for one's self, allies or company."[2]

The key difference between a sockpuppet and a regular pseudonym (sometimes termed an "alt" which is short for alternate, as in alternate identity) is the pretense that the puppet is a third party who is not affiliated with the puppeteer or acting under their control for their benefit. The earliest known[1] usage of the term was on July 9, 1993 by Dana Rollins in a posting to bit.listserv.fnord-l,[3] but the term was not in common usage in USENET groups until 1996."

My identity as user ElKeKomeIKanta was severely & unjustly treated as a sock puppet in the 1st place. There was no evidence, no thinking it through--I was just blocked, forever. I created the new account, and openly admitted it, in order to get assistance with my appeal of this block. NOW I am being blocked for "abuse" of multiple identities, which I suspect was the plan of the admin DrKiernan. So it looks like I have violated your rules. If you read above, you will see I have not violated anything at all. DrKiernan simply does not want me editing anywhere here, especially at Anna Anderson. He's very touchy about it, and offers no encouragement to editors there.DescribeAPlague (talk) 11:41, 22 May 2010 (UTC)