User talk:DerekTDR

Falanga (Poland) moved to draftspace

It appears that you may have a conflict of interest with the subject of Falanga (Poland), and as such you should submit this article to be published through the Articles for Creation process. Before editing the article further, please first disclose on your user page and on the article's Talk page whether you have received money to write this or other articles on Wikipedia, or if you have any other kind of conflict of interest concerning the subject. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. Before submitting, you should make sure that the article is fully compliant with Wikipedia’s neutrality and verifiability policies, as well as our notability guidelines. When you’re ready, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. This process is encouraged, but optional. If you choose not to participate in it, you can remove the AfC template and move the article back to mainspace. You should also consider reaching out to the Teahouse for additional feedback and aid from experienced editors. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:49, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have any conflict of interests. I just made it for free, for people, to make English Wikipedia more useful. DerekTDR (talk) 12:15, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Falanga (organisation) (August 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Falanga (organisation) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Akevsharma (talk) 00:41, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DerekTDR! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Akevsharma (talk) 00:41, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Falanga (organisation) has been accepted

Falanga (organisation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

_Signed, Pichemist ^{( Contribs | Talk )} 20:26, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DS notice: Eastern Europe

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 02:02, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What does it mean that I have "shown interest" in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. DerekTDR (talk) 16:20, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits have primarily focused on Poland, a country in Eastern Europe. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:38, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, because I am from Poland so it's important to me that Wikipedia have as many information about Poland and things that are in this country. I am interested in history and politics so that's why I am making edits with these categories. DerekTDR (talk) 17:52, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, and that's totally fine. Due to the often-contentious nature of the broader region's history and politics, and the way that disputes over history and politics often spill over into more mundane topics, the region as a whole is greenlit for administrators to intervene faster than we normally would for other topics. For a full list of other topics that are also under DS, see WP:DSTOPICS. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:08, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for helping. And the last question. Where I should add this DS/aware? In what part of user talk? Just making new discussion in user talk? DerekTDR (talk) 18:15, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The top of your user talk page is the best place to put it. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:18, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting already?

Hi there, it is standard practice, not just on Wikipedia, that acronyms are supplied on on first mention of the organization. I have not reverted you back however, as it isn't clear to me whether it is your contention that the acronym is simply wrong (not for the same organization) or just "unnecessary". If you just think it is unnecessary, I think you would be arguing with Manual of Style, and this is not the place to do that. If you are saying it is an error of fact, I request that you educate me on this subject. Thanks. Elinruby (talk) 19:42, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

However the name of this organization in this article is not important. It only shows at the beginning and the name or acronym is not used anywhere. I remember that I never mantioned it again, as I am the creator of the entire article. Of course feel free to edit something if you have more important information, not just unnecessary corrections. Acronyms are good for an article if the name is important for an article of if the name is a name of the organization that article says. E..g

However the name of this organization in this article is not important. It only shows at the beginning and the name or acronym is not used anywhere. I remember that I never mentioned it again, as I am the creator of the entire article. Of course feel free to edit something if you have more important information, not just unnecessary corrections. Acronyms are good for an article if the name is important for an article of if the name is a name of the organization that article says, e.g. National Radical Camp. But it's no need for National Radical Camp to have acronym at the page of Falanga as it only is mentioned at the beginning. DerekTDR (talk) 05:38, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is Wikipedia. Somebody sooner or later will almost certainly expand any given article. Meanwhile, whoever taught you about reverting but not the manual of style did you agreat disservice. MOS:ACRO1STUSE says you are wrong and should self-revert.Piotrus would be a good person to speak to if you have questions in future. Elinruby (talk) 07:11, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pinged, I appear. I am happy to offer mediation if it is needed. Derek, I also speak Polish (mówię po polsku) if it helps. Feel free to ask me any questions about English wiki practices, some are a bit differnt from Polish wiki ones. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:29, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a big deal, not really mediation material, but an editor who's heard of revert but not the manual of style could probably use a teacher, Professor ;) is all I am thinking. Somebody is gonna bite this newbie sometime soon maybe. Anyway. it won't be me, but I *am* going to revert him eventually if he doesn't read the linked section and do it himself. i dislike being reverted for bad reasons but I am putting him in your hands and going away now. Elinruby (talk) 07:41, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Calling me newbie hurts.
There are no teachers or professors on Wikipedia. I tried to find some using index "teacher:" before writing some nickname, but I cannot find one.

DerekTDR (talk) 11:15, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

if this is your first account on en-wiki, and I read correctly that it's about a month old, then it's just a description, and an allusion to the policy of "don't bite the newbies". In other words, you get the benefit of the doubt. Meanwhile, Wikipedia may not have teachers, but it does have mentors, and even if you don't want to sign up for that formal a relationship, I thought of Piotrus because he literally *is* a professor who assigns wikipedia work in his classes. And he speaks Polish. I have not noticed any issues with your English but I know *I* sometimes break into French when I am talking to people who also speak it, vecause those are the words that come.

In other words, relax, I was not making fun of you but rather offering help. Once I got over being annoyed. PS: good operating system, I have used that. Elinruby (talk) 20:23, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I joined 2 years ago as Wikipedia says to me. Also, thank you for mention about my OS. I changed it, so my user page is updated. DerekTDR (talk) 07:13, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, Derek, if you go to your Wikipedia:Preferences, you can enable "Newcomer editor features". One of the things it will give you is access to a randomly selected "mentor". Although I am happy to answer any questions you may have. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:16, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okey, thank you. I switched the 2nd option in "newcomer editor features". Also I have a question. Is there a list page with all "Wikipedia:" or "Help:" articles listed? So it's easier to you know, find rules. DerekTDR (talk) 07:15, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm. Help:Contents and Wikipedia:Contents might be what you are looking for? _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:11, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]