User talk:Depp pierre

Welcome!

Hello, Depp pierre, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! —D.Lazard (talk) 10:36, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Citation needed"

I see that most of your recent edit are aimed to add citations where articles are tagged {{citation needed}}. Thanks a lot for this work. However, it would be better to remove also the tag which become useless, as I did to Fermat's little theorem. D.Lazard (talk) 10:43, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright infringement

Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. You must not copy and paste text from sources you find on the web into articles as you did in the articles SonarSource and WhiteSource. I have removed the infringing text, but the material you copied is subject to copyright, as is almost everything on the web, and when creating or expanding articles, you should completely rewrite the information using your own words. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:59, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Antonia Albert for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Antonia Albert is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antonia Albert until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mr. Daniel Plainview (talk) 18:13, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Gil David Allouche

Hello, Depp pierre,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Gil David Allouche should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gil David Allouche .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 20:59, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Metadata (company) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Metadata (company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metadata (company) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Galobtter (pingó mió) 11:48, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WhiteSource Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WhiteSource Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of WhiteSource

The article WhiteSource has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Apparently promotional article, showing no evidence of notability. WP:REFBOMBed, but almost all refs are non-RSes, press-release churnalism or funding rounds, which squarely fail WP:CORPDEPTH; a WP:BEFORE shows only more press-release reprints, no coverage meeting WP:CORPDEPTH, nor anything meeting WP:GNG either. This article is basically a press release, with no material to make it not a press release.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Gerard (talk) 23:50, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]