User talk:Deondrerye84

December 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs was changed by Deondrerye84 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.931232 on 2016-12-15T23:40:19+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:40, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Shrek 2. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. JustBerry (talk) 01:09, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Robots (2005 film), you may be blocked from editing. SummerPhD^v2.0 01:17, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to How to Train Your Dragon (film). Eric-Wester (talk) 01:20, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are either not reading this page or have chosen to ignore the advice you have been given. If you do not understand or disagree, please discuss the issue here or on any of the articles' talk pages before continuing. If you continue without discussion, you will be blocked from editing. - SummerPhD^v2.0 01:39, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Deondrerye84, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

SummerPhD^v2.0 04:57, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Deondrerye84. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Katie^talk 12:27, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]