User talk:Denosio

December 2023

Hello, I'm LemonSlushie. I noticed that you recently removed content from Visa policy of Ukraine without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- LemonSlushie 🍋 (talk) (edits) 08:18, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Visa requirements for Egyptian citizens, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 09:16, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Visa requirements for Eritrean citizens, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 09:18, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Visa requirements for Nigerian citizens. Materialscientist (talk) 09:20, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 14:44, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please unlock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Denosio (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I know that I have deviated from the block. I had 4 accounts under these names : Denosio ( my original account ) , Yeri127 , Fridma99 and Gyography . I admit my guilt about this , forgive me . But I think it was unfair to block me without considering this reason. Please look at what I edited. I edited with argumentative links . I want to edit articles legally and thus improve Wikipedia. Please forgive me again. I am willing to follow Wikipedia's policy. If you forgive me , can you unblock my original account called Denosio and delete the others ? Thank you.Denosio (talk) 15:29, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

At this point your only way forward is the standard offer, six months with no edits. 331dot (talk) 15:40, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

By attempting to evade your block today, that clock has been reset, and will reset every time you subsequently attempt to evade this block. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:51, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just blocked another sock today.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:35, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]