User talk:Dennis Estenson II

This is my talk page, obviously. Leave a message if you like... --D. Estenson II June 28, 2005 07:58 (UTC)

Mr Estenson my name is frank i live in boston and i have some questions about Nikola Tesla. please contact me if you get a chance. thank you fjh3910@yahoo.com 10-24-08 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.94.147.17 (talk) 00:39, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please contact me

Dennis, your "know-it-all" attitude is exactly what I am looking for. I need a partner to help me complete my theory about Fourth Dimension. Just like you said yourself, I need to be proven either right or wrong, I am out of mainstrea also and what if my idea combined with your knowledge will produce an " elegant solution" long overdue? Please post a respond here if you are interested

It's quite unlikely that your theory is correct, but I am willing to listen. What is your idea all about? --D. Estenson II July 8, 2005 07:07 (UTC)

OK, fine then, don't tell me. --D. Estenson II 11:28, July 21, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for posting the new article on Timepage. I suggest you also have a look also at Benveniste on Water Memory. Jeffrey Newman 06:28, 12 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Note the following, which has just appeared on User:Christopher Thomas "Pitkänens article was deleted after this VfD: Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Topological Geometrodynamics. Most likely the not very well hidden attempts to manipulate the vote was a major cause of the final admin decision. --Pjacobi 16:30, July 12, 2005 (UTC)" You seem to be entering some contraversial areas! Jeffrey Newman 17:39, 12 July 2005 (UTC) To be accurate, it is on Christopher Thomas' talk page.[reply]

Gravity

Dennis -

I think that we need to talk, either in this space or off-line about what to do about the gravity and related pages. However, I don't have time for it either today or tomorrow. --EMS | Talk 17:20, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have no interest in taking the collaboration offline. I simply came across gravity a few weeks ago and streamlined the intro a bit, then voiced my opinion about some other problems with the structure of the article. I am in no hurry to get the article fixed, but if wikipedia is to be a serious source of information, the article does need to be fixed. --D. Estenson II 07:30, July 28, 2005 (UTC)

Kant

Kant's statement about magnetic matter was an attempt to assert that all knowledge must be ultimately, somehow, based on experience. If our senses cannot contact an object directly, then we can still know the object indirectly by its effect on other, sensed, objects. This is the technique used to claim the existence of Black Holes. We can't detect them, but we can detect their effect on other celestial objects. The same method is used with molecules in Brownian Motion and also with Gravitational Waves. 64.12.116.201 15:23, 21 September 2005 (UTC)G. Lestrade[reply]

My objection is with the terminology and stating, as if matter of fact, that "magnetic matter" exists. D. Estenson II (talk) 07:17, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]