User talk:Dennis767

Sino-Soviet border conflict

Please stop removing sourced content at Sino-Soviet border conflict without giving a valid reason as to why you are removing the content. If you would like to make such drastic changes, please discuss it on the talk page first. Thank you. JudgeRM (talk to me) 16:57, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please read above. Carefully. If you don't follow the above, you may get blocked again. JudgeRM (talk to me) 17:31, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sino-Soviet border conflict. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be undone.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. JudgeRM (talk to me) 17:07, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Sino-Soviet border conflict.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop removing sourced content. If you want it changed, please discuss it on the talk page. JudgeRM (talk to me) 17:12, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sino-Soviet border conflict. JudgeRM (talk to me) 17:18, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 17:44, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Sino-Soviet border conflict, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please stop removing well-sourced content with unsourced content. If you want to change it, discuss at the talk page and provide reliable sources relating to your changes. Thank you. JudgeRM (talk to me) 17:38, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 17:43, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dennis767 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologize and I will not repeat previous behavior. I will seek consensus for whatever changes I want to do at talk page first. Dennis767 (talk) 13:58, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You may want to comment on your block evasion, too. Huon (talk) 15:26, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.