User talk:DenisGusinje

October 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Battle of Novšiće has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Battle of Novšiće was changed by DenisGusinje (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2015-10-08T17:49:01+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:49, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Novšiće

Hi DenisGusinje.

Please do not remove substantial content in the article as you did so far. The article is of mid-importance for both Albania and Montenegro WP, therefore please restrain yourself from making disruptive changes like that.

There is a talk page, please discuss there if you think something should be changed and be patient.

Mondiad (talk) 22:58, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DenisGusinje, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi DenisGusinje!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:30, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Battle of Novšiće with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 22:34, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content until agreement reached on the talk page

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Novšiće. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.Mondiad (talk) 12:49, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Novsice

I will continue to edit it because it's simply not fair to the history to have an article with facts like this one has.I explained myself in talk page of Battle of Novsice.

Dear DenisGusinje. This is wikipedia. Its not history. Don't take it too serious. I respect your position and I am glad that you are able to present source for your position. Don't edit war. There is WP:DR process which should be followed in case of disputes. Please try to follow it instead of edit warring. If you need some help, I would be glad to help you, regardless of offenses you wrote to me. All the best.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 13:29, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:52, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning

The fact that you are new cannot be used as an excuse forever. Listen and try to talk. There are several editors invoked, trying to discuss and help you. Please do not change anything abruptly just because someone in your town has told you that the things have gone differently from what is written here. Do not take the article out of League of Prizren context. It is of high importance for WP:Albania. Try to reach a consensus first. And keep discussing in the talk page. The references in English if possible.Mondiad (talk) 13:53, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Too many warnings

You have been warned many times. Do not revert any other users changes just because it is easy. Keep providing references in the talk page until we reach and agreement. You are not new to this anymore.Mondiad (talk) 14:00, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You can't stop me.DenisGusinje (talk) 14:18, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been reported

Hello DenisGusinje.
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#DenisGusinje_reported. Thanks and regards. Mondiad (talk) 21:03, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The complaint says you have been edit warring at Battle of Novšiće. Clearly you've made a lot of reverts, even without making any judgment on who is more likely to be right. See the latest comment by an admin. You may still be able avoid a block. The above statement "You can't stop me" doesn't suggest any willingness to negotiate. The report might be closed with no action if you will agree to wait for consensus before changing the article again. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 02:55, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was editing it because I will not let someone who is not from my place, not even my state, to write an article what happened in the place of my origin and in my own state. After we had arguments, which ended up supporting my side, the page is edited and it's right for now. You can't stop is just honest words, if someone tries to manipulate my history. The page looks fine for now, I stopped editing. If I get blocked and the page fact change ( only because someones ignorance ) I will have my moves which are going to retake it back as it is.

RegadsDenisGusinje (talk) 06:23, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are planning to keep on changing the page back to your version if anyone else changes it? You also won't let anyone who isn't local to your country do any work on the page? EdJohnston (talk) 19:36, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, I will just not let someone with limited knowledge to edit something just to say that his people won, even if the historians are not agreeing with that.That battle happened 10km of the place my origin is from and I know that battle very good to know everything about it. This is not supported only by me, but from dozens of historians in Montenegro and even state of Montenegro itself.No one can change it just because someone feels ashamed that he lost.

DenisGusinje (talk) 22:26, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DenisGusinje, please do not to mock the other editors based on ethnic ground by restricting comments like "someone feels ashamed that he lost", "just to say that his people won". The article talks about 1879. The belligerents were Principality of Montenegro and League of Prizren, not today's Gusinje Municipality. So many things have changed since then. Because the battle-place is located right by your home or 10km away, doesn't give you any ownership of truth. Try to see the big picture. Mondiad (talk) 23:08, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DenisGusinje, is this the best you can do? Your answer doesn't give admins a warm feeling about your ability to edit neutrally and calmly in the future. It sounds like you reserve the right to edit war with anyone you don't feel is well enough qualified to speak about this battle. Only people who live nearby appear to be qualified, according to you. EdJohnston (talk) 23:46, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The state of Montenegro, I repeat, the STATE OF MONTENEGRO, support's my facts in the book that was published with state help and with book that is used in education system. What more do you want ?DenisGusinje (talk) 12:39, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Battle of Novšiće

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Battle of Novšiće. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at the AE board. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:52, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Novšiće is covered by discretionary sanctions under WP:ARBMAC

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Balkans, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

EdJohnston (talk) 15:55, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is how you threat people who are trying to provide the most accurate facts, I have lost faith in wikipedia.DenisGusinje (talk) 16:00, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]