User talk:Democraticsystem

RE:

In lieu with your message here:

BITCH!!!FUCKER!!!
YOU THINK YOUR SO SMART FUCKING BITCH!!!!

I am asking you why you are saying this thing to me. You should consider practicing good faith to fellow users as well as no attacks as possible (because so far, I cannot see any reason why you should do that to me. I tried to look on your contributions but it seemed that we are not correlated to each other. Your attack is inflammatory and uses defamatory words, and if you shall do it once again, I will never hesitate to ask for your blockage. Thanks. Have a nice day. From: •LeMaR• ^{我爱土木工程!} 06:40, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You should explain for this post, sir, because you gave defamatory words that are subjected for blocking of your user account as well as your IP. From: •LeMaR• ^{我爱土木工程!} 07:37, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think you should explain this first.--JL 09^{Talk to me!} 15:56, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page President of the Philippines has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bmultiply\.com (links: http://filipinopresidency.multiply.com/, http://filipinopresidency.multiply.com/ (redirect from http://filipinopresidency.multiply.com/)).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 05:56, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Images on List of Presidents of the Philippines

They can't be used there since it's not fair use. –Howard the Duck 05:38, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Images on List of Presidents of the Philippines

They can't be used there since it's not fair use. –Howard the Duck 05:38, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:ErapInauguration.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:ErapInauguration.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 08:00, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:RamosInauguration.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:RamosInauguration.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 06:28, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:PresidentGloriaArroyo.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:PresidentGloriaArroyo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 21:17, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uploading images where there is an existing free alternative.

Hi Democraticsystem. Please note that under the non-free content policy on Wikipedia, we do not host copyrighted images where there is a freely licence alternative either available or one could be created. This means that if you find an existing image in an article, you should not upload a copyrighted image and replace it. The image you upload will be removed and, in due course, probably deleted. Wikipedia aims to be the free encyclopedia and hosts copyrighted images only in cases where there is no other option - Peripitus (Talk) 23:28, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:EstradaAtAbubakar.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:EstradaAtAbubakar.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 23:39, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Diosdado Macapagal

Can you please explain why you made this edit? It is misleading. The link you added is not the Philippine Presidency Project. TheCoffee (talk) 12:33, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to butt in, but this user does not respond to fellow user's queries.--JL 09^{Talk to me!} 14:03, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Estrada

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Joseph Estrada, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.--JL 09^{Talk to me!} 12:30, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent addition to Joseph Estrada has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. You made a copy-paste from and is violating Wikipedia rules.--JL 09 ^_q?_{_c} 15:13, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:File:Anti-cha-cha1997.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:File:Anti-cha-cha1997.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. JL 09 ^_q?_{_c} 12:42, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Joseph Estrada, you will be blocked from editing. JL 09 ^_q?_{_c} 11:18, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Diosdado Macapagal. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. JL 09 ^_q?_{_c} 13:09, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:PresidentJoseLaurel.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PresidentJoseLaurel.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --(ESkog)^(Talk) 16:07, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:PresidentSergioOsmeña.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PresidentSergioOsmeña.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --(ESkog)^(Talk) 16:08, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Manuelroxas.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Manuelroxas.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --(ESkog)^(Talk) 16:09, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:PresidentRamonMagsaysay.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PresidentRamonMagsaysay.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --(ESkog)^(Talk) 16:09, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Presidentcarlospgarcia.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Presidentcarlospgarcia.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --(ESkog)^(Talk) 16:10, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Diosdado Macapagal has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Shadowjams (talk) 09:06, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:PresidentDiosdadoMacapagal.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:PresidentDiosdadoMacapagal.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. JL 09 ^_{q?_c} 14:11, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Manuelroxas.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Manuelroxas.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. JL 09 ^_{q?_c} 14:13, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Presidentcarlospgarcia.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Presidentcarlospgarcia.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. JL 09 ^_{q?_c} 14:15, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I undid your edit

Because it was entirely copied from Maguindanao Massacre page. We'll appreciate if you'll not just copy pasting contents. Reply here.--JL 09 ^_{q?_c} 17:18, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you.

Also, when you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page.

And most importantly.. please read this: One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. œ ^™ 02:15, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Bagumbayan-Volunteers for a New Philippines. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 04:14, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bagumbayan movement.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bagumbayan movement.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 04:15, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jose Roy

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Jose Roy, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.senate.gov.ph/senators/former_senators/jose_roy.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:16, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jose Roy

A tag has been placed on Jose Roy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Acather96 (talk) 09:23, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free content

Please do not revert edits which enforce our non-free content policies. We take copyright very seriously and we are all careful to only use non-free content in limited, appropriate ways. If you have a question about a specific removal, feel free to ask me, but don't revert again please. (ESkog)^(Talk) 14:39, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"from Metro Manila"

Not only was that cringe-worthy (LOL) but it only applies for federal states. –HTD (ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens.) 07:13, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, you'd have to provide at least a sorta-valid reason on why you insist on adding those cringe-worthy "from Metro Manila" stuff. –HTD (ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens.) 18:49, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please, can you even tell me why you insist on adding "from Tarlac/any other place" in descriptions in presidential election articles? I've tried communicating with you but you haven't answered. Philippine media simply does not do this and you and I have been reverting each other for months but you haven't provided a reason.

You've also been adding galleries with 2 to 3 photos, and some photos already appeared at the infobox. If that;s not redundancy, I don't know what is. I can probably agree on using galleries when there are like 5 photos (in which there'd be two rows of images) but if there's only a couple, using thumbs, or not using it at all, might be a better idea.

Please at least respond to my comments, Thanks. –HTD (ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens.) 04:54, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Joseph Estrada. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. See, for example, this diff. Jan1naD ^{(talk • contrib)} 13:25, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tonight starring Steve Allen-Intertitle.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tonight starring Steve Allen-Intertitle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:52, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tonight starring Jack Paar-Intertitle.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tonight starring Jack Paar-Intertitle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 22:35, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]