User talk:DemisLittleWarrior

November 2023

Your edit to Emilia Clarke has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Belbury (talk) 12:58, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

What exactly is the violation here and why was the picture changed AGAIN? The picture uploaded was a screenshot from an interview, everyone was credited accordingly and it hasn't been removed from Wiki Commons. DemisLittleWarrior (talk) 15:20, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

It was a screenshot from a copyrighted interview clip. The file is flagged for speedy deletion on Commons.

Wikipedia generally can't use copyrighted images of people, especially not when other freely licenced photos exist. Belbury (talk) 15:23, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

IJBOL. DemisLittleWarrior (talk) 15:38, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Good for you.

Please don't upload any more copyrighted video screenshots to Commons. Belbury (talk) 15:54, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Okay, Wiki warrior!! DemisLittleWarrior (talk) 16:04, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Janitor maybe. Nobody's here to fight you. Belbury (talk) 16:11, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

July 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Emilia Clarke. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. At the time of writing, you are at WP:2RR. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 21:13, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi again SuperMarioMan, thank you for yet *another* issue I have to address!! I did, in fact, use the talk page to discuss the change I thought would be nice, and got responses that agreed. The user who did not agree, reverted the change before anyone could respond and then accused me of creating multiple accounts because people got annoyed and agreed with me. Then I got accused of recruiting people (?) because their accounts were new. As I said, I belong in a fandom, and was backed up by people who were unhappy with the picture that was used before. I don't have the power to control who decides to join the discussion about something that bothered them. DemisLittleWarrior (talk) 22:02, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  RickinBaltimore (talk) 00:10, 3 July 2024 (UTC)