User talk:DemirBajraktarevic

Hi Demir,

I noticed that you added Bosnian Serb as ethnicity. Bosnian Serb is not ethnicity. It is demonym. Like Herzegovinian Serb. Please be so kind to revert this edit of your which implies there is Bosnian Serb ethnicity in the article about Bogdan Zimonjic (for example he is Serb from Herzegovinia) or any other article in which you made the same mistake. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kabuuum (talk • contribs) 10:01, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Belated welcome!

Hello DemirBajraktarevic, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Shearonink (talk) 17:38, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Bosnia and Herzegovina Barnstar of National Merit
		I have noticed your edits and appreciated them greatly. Thank you for your contributions to the articles within scope of WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina.
		_{this WikiAward was given to DemirBajraktarevic by Antidiskriminator (talk) on 21:40, 9 August 2012 (UTC)}[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wild Strawberries (album)

The article Wild Strawberries (album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable musical release. No indepth coverage in refs. No sign of charting.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:43, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vatra (album)

The article Vatra (album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable musical release. No indepth coverage in any refs. No sign of charting

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:46, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Phyllis Diller

Hi. At this point, you changed several correct uses of endashes to hyphens, which I've reverted. Per WP:NDASH, WP style is that date ranges use an unspaced endash, except when the dates contain spaces, in which case they use a spaced endash. Also, "U.S.A." is a specifically discouraged form of abbreviation per WP:NOTUSA. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 07:00, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maglaj, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Painter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Esma Redžepova, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macedonians (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hollywood to Dollywood, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chad Allen and Ann Walker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:29, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Emina Jahović, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Serbian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:02, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Hello, I'm Calvin999. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to List of songs recorded by Adele because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! I told you once, and you ignored me, and made the same edit again. They all have to be wiki-linked because the columns are sortable, and therefore if they are clicked on, the top one will not be linked. I've promoted two of the same lists by different singers to FL, I know the criteria and what is required, so don't ignore me when I explain why you were wrong to do so. AARON• ^TALK 23:35, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kiki Lesenrić redirect

Hello,

Next time you redirect a page, make sure that the redirect is proper, as in the case of Kiki Lesendrić it wasn't. Checking the official website could prove this (http://www.kikilesendric.rs/), or books like Yu Rock Enciklpedija by Petar Janjatović, etc.--Milosppf (talk) 11:06, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Emina Cunmulaj

Since you have only edited from 2012 I need to explain a few things to you on naming policies. Emina Cunmulaj grew up in Montenegro, so the first significant part of her life was as a Yugoslav cizitzen (given Montenegro was part of a federation until 2006). We provide names of persons to reflect their official status in their homeland and there is no way this subject could have had an identity on state documentation by any other format. The connection between Dušan Bajević and Greece is even weaker as he became a ciziten in later life and has no connection to there now, but his name continues to be given in Greek and such it shall remain.

We recently held a mediation discussion whereby two Albanian users attempted to wipe Wikipedia clean of Slavic translations for their subjects, they jumped up and down and could find no reason, particularly in light of the fact that translations exist to provide readers with some form of biographical information. Removal of this information requires justification, such as the subject leaving the region the age of a few months and never returning while the language was being used (disclaimer for Rita Ora and Agonit Sallaj). Our subject here falls into the same category as Lorenc Antoni who was not born on Slavic territory but lived a significant portion of his life on it, or from outside the region Roman von Ungern-Sternberg who has his name in Russian despite neither being ethnically Russian nor born in the region.

If you would like to contest these policies, you need to request a renewed mediation per the above link or gain a consensus article by article. You cannot however join the site and go on a rampage to remove established features that predate your appointment. Now if you have any questions, please feel free to ask me either here on on my own talk. Thanks. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 10:15, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lepa Brena, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brčko (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:06, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Nesim Tahirović (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Painter

Šako Polumenta (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Montenegrin people

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Meša Selimović. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please, dont remove sourced material, that is violation of viki rules, and specially per your reason. Wiki is not here for nationalistic struggle. WhiteWriter^speaks 19:54, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Please do revert yourself. You are edit-warring now. I told you nicely not to remove sourced infos, but still, for some unknown reason, you continue to do so. Be kind enough to revert your last edit at the Osman Kulenović article, unless you are fine with report to the administrators' noticeboard. Thank you. --Wüstenfuchs 03:29, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll report you first for trying to Croatia-ify a Bosniak man --DemirBajraktarevic (talk) 03:31, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but your accusations are baseless. I told you nicely. There is a discussion here that involves you. --Wüstenfuchs 03:36, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Jayron32 05:17, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You were blocked for edit warring for 24h, and the next day, you go and revert again. Since I see no useful discussion from you on Talk, and I do see a lot of advocacy and yelling in edit summaries that is a violation of WP:ARBMAC, I'm extending the block. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 10:24, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alija Sirotanović, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yugoslav (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:27, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fadil Hadžić

This is the latest article where I saw a tendentious edit summary and editing from you:

CROATIAN? don't think so [1]

Undid revision 523777313 by GregorB (talk) he was Bosnian [2]

Please stop acting in such a childish manner. If you want to edit encyclopedic articles, please add actual worthwhile content into them. Your only foray into that article has been to add a single sentence about a 1972 film including a Bosniak singer.[3] So your sole purpose there appears to have been promotion of members of an ethnicity. WP:ARBMAC expressly forbids the use of Wikipedia for such blatant nationalism.

In a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user editing Balkans-related articles in a disruptive way. If you continue with the behaviour on Fadil Hadžić, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article/topic ban. Thank you.

--Joy [shallot] (talk) 07:47, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. by Kevin12cd Talk to me This was posted at 01:51, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Please, do not revert my edits without good explanation.

You haven't showed the pages in your earlier edits, so your sources couldn't be verified. You can see how I added the pages, you can do the same way.

Do not edit war, take the problem to the talk page.

Thank you, --Wüstenfuchs 16:50, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, DemirBajraktarevic. You have new messages at User talk:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Me%C5%A1a_Selimovi%C4%87#Ethnicity_and_understanding_of_.22nacionalnost.22_in_former_Yugoslavia.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Disambiguation link notification for December 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hayat Production, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hayat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

There is a discussion here that involves you.

--Wüstenfuchs 17:45, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring (multiple articles) and disruptive editing, as you did at Osman Karabegović. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 23:16, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jugoton

Nisam uklonio Silvanu Armenulić iz članka, premestio sam je pod A. Kada se solo izvođači stavljaju na liste izvođača, obično se ređaju po prezimenu a ne po imenu. Ostalocutanje (talk) 12:40, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Marie Prevost

Hi. I have reverted this edit to Marie Prevost because you did not add a source for her cause of death. It took quite a while to rewrite and source this article - please don't add a made up cause of death when the subject's cause of death is already sourced and correct. I went by newspaper reports and doubled checked the subject's death certificate (which only says "acute alcoholism", not heart failure). We go by what sources say, not guesses. Also, there's no need to change links that go directly to the correct article about a city/town/state. Only relink something that leads to an incorrect article. Thanks. Pinkadelica ^♣ 01:18, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Emina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Salaam (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012 (2)

There is a discussion here that concerns you. Please, participate. --Wüstenfuchs 12:01, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Help with link

Could you be so kind as to check whether the Google books link in citation no. 7 (Velikonja) in the article History of Bosnia and Herzegovina (1878–1918) is working for you? Pages 130 through 135 should be accessible in the book in question. Thanks. Praxis Icosahedron (talk) 17:57, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Block

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent edit warring, on numerous articles. I came here because of edit warring on Sokollu Mehmed Pasha, but I discovered that you have a regular habit of edit warring, and that several short blocks have not got the message through to you. This time, the block is for one month, but if you do not get the point that edit warring is unacceptable then you are very likely to be blocked indefinitely before long. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:35, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DemirBajraktarevic (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There was debate about the ethnicity of Sokollu Mehmed Pasha on the article talk page that I did not participate in and was not aware of until this block. I added the page to my watchlist as I did with every person who was on the List of Bosniaks wiki. If you look through the article's revision history you'll see that almost all but one of my reverts was me reverting IPs that claimed he was born into a Serb family, which I reverted believing (because I had read his name on the Bosniak people list and was not aware about the debate about his ethnicity) it was vandalism or someones POV. The last revert was me reverting a revision done by Nado158 just assuming that that too was vandalism without knowing all the facts. I apologize for reverting edits without taking it to the talk page to discuss with other users before reverting. In the future, before reverting edits about ethnicity, I will take the discussion to the article's talk page and agree with other users before changing the ethnicity of the person. --DemirBajraktarevic (talk) 13:16, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

After several blocks for edit warring, you ought to know the relevant policy especially the part which explains that content disputes are not vandalism. Max Semenik (talk) 23:13, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Removal

Demir, this kind of editing is problematic. Please, you are not allowed to remove one nation from the article without any logical reason. As you may know, this kind of nationalistic editing is highly problematic on wiki, and you should restore the template and category that you removed. --WhiteWriter^speaks 20:25, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lepa Brena, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brčko (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Adnan Zahirović, you may be blocked from editing. Giant Snowman 10:26, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Adnan Zahirovic is a Bosniak. i'm a Bosniak too. His name is Adnan (a muslim name) and he's from Bosnia. a Muslim from Bosnia is a BOSNIAK --DemirBajraktarevic (talk) 10:36, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sejad Salihović, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bosnian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:31, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Antun Knežević

I have removed 5 unsourced categories for this man. He does not meet the Wikipedia definition for Bosniak and the article clearly states he is a Catholic and not a Muslim, so I would be thankful if you did not add him to the Muslim category. I have also noticed that you have categorised many people as Muslims without adding any relevant sources. Some of these include: Sanela Diana Jenkins, Damir Vrančić and Ervin Zukanović. Please can you add references if you decide to revert what I have done. Spiderone 09:04, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Meho Kodro - and others i assume?

Hi there DB, AL "here",

please don't write "present day Bosnia" in the players' infobox, when they were born the country was Yugoslavia, the details are shown in the body of article OK? For Russian/Lithuanian/Latvian (etc) players the same, we write Soviet Union if they were born before the region's independence, not "Soviet Union, present day Lithuania". In your way, the box is needlessly long, when we can write that info in storyline or intro.

Attentively - --AL (talk) 16:07, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited NTV Hayat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hayat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:17, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merit

		The Bosnia and Herzegovina Barnstar of National Merit
		For your incessant surveillance of Bosnia and Herzegovina-related articles with regard to precision and accuracy. Praxis Icosahedron (talk) 23:26, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Hello

You just need to get to those new titles, Hajde da se volimo 2 and Hajde da se volimo 3, while logged in.

One way is to create the article and then just type in the links (like I did above), and preview it. You'll see the red links - you don't have to save them, just click on those two links in new tabs/windows. You'll get two clean new article screens, and in each one you can add a redirect back to the series article.

Another way of getting to a new article at some title is to search for the exact term in the search box. Atop of the results, you'll see the same red link.

If you have any more questions, please feel free to let me know. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 12:10, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I did this for you now, and I also disambiguated the first title. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 10:32, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nevesinli Salih Pasha

Hi Demir, in the Ottoman Empire there were several names of the capital, İstanbul, İslambol, Konstantiniye, Dersaadet, Asitane, but never Constantinople. The later name was used only in foreign embassies. Cheers.Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 07:15, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Music Barnstar
		For your exceptional effort and dedication to music-related articles. Antidiskriminator (talk) 08:49, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cookies!

	Here's a plate full of cookies to share!
	Hi DemirBajraktarevic, here are some delicious cookies to help brighten your day! However, there are too many cookies here for one person to eat all at once, so please share these cookies with at least two other editors by copying {{subst:Sharethecookies}} to their talk pages. Enjoy! WhiteWriter^speaks 14:20, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: age

The word is actually described on en:, at Aga (Ottoman Empire). Granted, I don't know if that particular song has a more subtle meaning, but still. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 06:45, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Enis Bešlagić

Adding unsourced categories is against Wikipedia rules. Are you aware of this? Give me one reason why I shouldn't have them removed. Spiderone 14:37, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Serbs and Croats have believe that Bosniaks are "Turkified" Serbs/Croats. You can't remove the categories "Bosniak people" from every Bosniak persons wiki because of your warped personal beliefs. "Bosniak" IS an ethnicity whether you personally like it or not. You could justify removing the categories from wikis of people with the name "Nenad" but you cannot justify removing the categories from wikis of Bosnian people with Muslim names like you did with Adnan Bešić, Muhamed Filipović‎, Fuad Gazibegović, Tahir Niksic or Hasan Cemalovic‎. The Bosniaks wiki says: "Bosniaks are typically characterized by their historic tie to the Bosnian historical region, traditional adherence to Islam".

I will be reporting you--DemirBajraktarevic (talk) 14:47, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Read my talk page. You need to stop adding unsourced categories based on people's names. Is Zlatan Ibrahimovic a Muslim then? No. Spiderone 14:52, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Silvana Armenulić, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mixed marriage (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:13, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mile Kitić may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

===[[Extended play|Extended plays (EP's)===

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:13, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

It's just fun, relax...

Vitriden (talk) 16:36, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube is not valid reference. Also, regarding national disputes, leave Yugoslav, that is the best solution. --WhiteWriter^speaks 17:18, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Video on YouTube is NOT GOOD thing for wikipedia, and it will be removed instantly. Do NOT add it again. We have a RULE that YouTube should net be added as reference. WP:NOYT So, again in order to understand. It does not matter what is on video, video should net be added at all. You should better find some normal reliable source about it, and raise that question on talk. That way would be the best, and only in that way you will not be blocked for constant reverts. Also, we have tons of articles where we just write Yugoslav, when etnicity is disputed. Thank you, and meet you there, on Talk:Lepa Brena. --WhiteWriter^speaks 22:34, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bosnian Serbs

If you pay close attention you will see that the sentence is not clear on what "then" intends: the 10th century when the De Administrando Imperio was written (accurate) or the reign of Heraklius (wrong)? Indicating the rule of Caslav resolves this ambiguity. 90.230.54.125 (talk) 01:55, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bijeljina may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[[Kovanluk (Bijeljina|Kovanluk]],

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:51, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replacing Serbian Cyrillic with Cyrillic?

May I ask why you remove Serbian language from villages in Bosnia and Herzegovina, and replace them with generic Cyrillic?--Zoupan 13:08, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please answer, and understand that this is WP:ARBMAC-territory. You commented "Serbian Cyrillic in Serbia, just Cyrillic in Bosnia" which is false. The Cyrillic script used in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia is the script and alphabet developed by Serbian linguist Vuk Karadžić; it is used widely by the country's Serbs (Croats and Bosniaks do not use it), especially in Republika Srpska. Dubbing it only Cyrillic is POV. The official languages of the state include Serbian. --Zoupan 13:39, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. --Zoupan 17:34, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Suzanne Krull may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*''[[Phil of the Future]]'' (2004–05

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:55, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Batuša may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

'''Batuša''' ([[Cyrillic]]: Батуша}}) is a [[village]] in the [[Municipalities of Bosnia and Herzegovina|municipality]] of [[Gornji

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:51, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Gradačac may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* [[Yugoslavs[[ – 321 (0.66%)

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:36, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Šamac, Bosnia and Herzegovina may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* Serbs]] - 13,628 (41.34%)

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:26, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ethnic categories

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Mersad Selimbegović. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Giant Snowman 13:47, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Anesa Kajtazović edit undone

I have undone your recent edits to Anesa Kajtazović, including the move to that new name, as the edits were unsourced. Before reinstating them, please find a proper source for the content of the edits. AS for the name of the article, keep in mind that we use the WP:COMMONNAME. As Anesa Kajtazovic doesn't use the "ć" character in her campaign page, it seems unlikely that that is part of her "commonname", though if it is, please let us know through appropriate sources in the article or discussion on the article talk page. Thank you. – Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 20:18, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the above, I see that this is not the first time that you've made such edits. While sourced contributions are welcomed and ounsourced "commonsense" contributions may occasionally be useful, this is an area that really needs sources for its edits. Thank you. – Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 20:23, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your prompt response! It's kind of cool to know that ther eare so many foreign-language sources about an Iowa legislator!

The content appears to be somewhat pro-labor and pro-Anesa Kajtazovic at the moment, so I hope you won't be offended if I make some adjustments to help it align more closely with WP:NPOV. Thanks and Happy editing! – Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 02:07, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kerry Burt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cedar Falls (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Boban Rajović

Read again my reverts... i placed him as a Serbian/Montenegrin singer ... both links leading to both states - Serbia and Montenegro, i didnt claim he is a Serbian singer ethnically. Simply because he produces his music in Serbia and lives there... he only visits Montenegro probably for vacation and he was yet born in Denmark... how much of a singer of Montenegro that makes him? Btw you said he mentioned he speaks Montenegrin language, i cant see that nowhere in that article... he said "Po crnogorski zapjevo" ... it is just a simple saying... there is no proof about him speaking that kind of language. Just like i would say "onako sam se zadrao po bosanski" ... and i dont speak the language, nor did i want to say i speak it by that. know what i mean' Do you agree? (Правичност (talk) 18:58, 18 August 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alija Isaković, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South Slavic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Herzegovinian Serbs and Bosnian Serbs

Hi Demir,

I noticed that you added Bosnian Serb as ethnicity. Bosnian Serb is not ethnicity. It is demonym. Like Herzegovinian Serb. Please be so kind to revert this edit of your which implies there is Bosnian Serb ethnicity in the article about Aleksa Santic or any other article in which you eventually made the same mistake. Thank you and keep up the good work.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 07:17, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

reverted edits

I've reverted your edits to Antun Branko Šimić because a) there was no edit summary explaining what you were doing - see WP:ES b) you were changing the date formats for no apparent reason - see MOS:DATE c) you were italicizing English terms instead of doing that to foreign terms - see MOS:ITALICS. In addition, you replaced the term "Herzegovinian Croat" with "Bosnian Croat" for a person who is clearly from Herzegovina rather than Bosnia - completely pointless. You need to have a consistent style and a clear understanding of policies if you're going to be doing this - I saw that you're doing the same thing elsewhere en masse. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 11:06, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kraj potoka bistre vode for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kraj potoka bistre vode is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kraj potoka bistre vode until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KDS4444^Talk 08:29, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Safet Plakalo

Category:Bosniaks of Bosnia and Herzegovina is already a subcategory of Category:Bosniak people, and Category:Bosnia and Herzegovina dramatists and playwrights is already a subcategory of Category:Theatre in Bosnia and Herzegovina — so for both pairs, Safet Plakalo does not need to be filed in both the subcategory and the parent category at the same time. See WP:DIFFUSE, for example; Wikipedia's policy is to avoid duplicate categorization of that type in most cases. Rather, he belongs only in Category:Bosniaks of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Category:Bosnia and Herzegovina dramatists and playwrights, and not in the two parents. Bearcat (talk) 03:14, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stop vandalising Sokollu Mehmed Pasha article

The Cyrillic used to spell his name is Serbian Cyrillic not just any Cyrillic as is clear from the presence of the letter ћ which no other Cyrillic has.

Also, since Serbian Orthodoxy was THE ONLY Orthodoxy in Bosnia of Sokollu Mehmed Pasha time, do not change that to a blanket term Eastern Orthodoxy covering Orthodox believers from Japan through all of Asia and Europe to Vancouver. — Preceding unsigned comment added by QueerStudiesRS (talk • contribs) 08:45, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hasan Brkić may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|PLACE OF BIRTH = Livno, Condominium of Bosnia, Austria-Hungary)

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:34, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jelena Gruba may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Serbiae, Bosnae, Ragusii ed: Fr|last=Miklǒsich|first=Franz Ritter von|year=1858|page=222}}</ref>), is the Bosnian equivalent of [[Helen]] ({{lang-la|Helena}}<ref>{{quote|Helena, Bosnæ regina,

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:31, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Himzo Polovina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mixed marriage (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:45, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jelena Gruba

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jelena Gruba. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--Zoupan 19:17, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing: Serbo-Croatian includes Bosnian. Jelena is a Serbo-Croatian Christian feminine given name; the name is not "culturally Bosnian", as in the case that it is important to stress "Bosnian name Jelena" instead of "Serbo-Croatian name Jelena". Bosančica did not exist at that time, and it is not sure that it existed at all in its own right. Stephen Dabiša was titled "King of the Serbs. Bosnia. [etc]", and he used Cyrillic at his court; Jelena's name is written Єлена. Jelena's origin is in the Serbian Nikolić noble family of Hum. The Serbian language is official in Bosnia and Herzegovina (a country having historical ties to the Kingdom of Bosnia and Hum). Having addressed these matters clearly, I hope you start thinking about your [sometimes negative] input here on Wikipedia.--Zoupan 20:02, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Krvavac

Hello Demir. You made this edit[4] which good as reverted my whole contribution. Why the distinction between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Both land on the same target except you use the long form which I don't see to be necessary. Also, about the Siege of Sarajevo, how does this affect the death of the subject? I mentioned this on the talk page. Had he died as a result of the siege (eg. shot by sniper) then the event is relevant but otherwise, the siege pertains to Sarajevo itself and not Krvavac. --Janjušević (talk) 01:12, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I just realised they don't land on the same page, so you're right about Republic of which produces correct period article. What about the siege? Is that relevant to Krvavac's death? Janjušević (talk) 22:06, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tamburica may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Eastern]] and [[Central Europe]], particularly [[Hungary]], [[Bosnia and Herzegovina]], [Serbia]] (especially [[Vojvodina]]), [[Slovenia]], [[Croatia]] (especially [[Slavonia]]). It is also known

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:44, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bosnian language

As you had been suborn for some time now about removing Cyrillic and Serbian Cyrillic, now when I got time, I will propose something that would actually be correct, and that is to include Cyrillic in ALL Bosnia-related articles, as both scrypts are official in Bosnia. FkpCascais (talk) 15:54, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Calling that "childish" is a point of view. Serbs are constituent people of BiH, and use Cyrillic, also, Cyrillic is official in Bosnia and Herzegovina. So it doesn´t seem childish at all to me. FkpCascais (talk) 22:39, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Cyrillic forms of names of Bosniaks is utterly wrong. Cyrillic and Latin are both used as scripts in Bosnian language; both are taught to Bosnian-speaking children, and children unable to use both equally are considered semiliterate. Bosniaks are not Croats. Latin script is no more Bosnian than Cyrillic script; in fact, Cyrillic has been used in Bosnia for far, far longer than Latin. That being sad, I've strongly opposed your efforts to portray Latin script as the only one used in Bosnian language, and will continue to do so. Surtsicna (talk) 23:14, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Laktaši

Hello Demire.

Thanks for this clean-up[5]. There was just one thing. I am aware that Bosniak/Muslim is the same but down to what people choose. Since this is so and you have the statistics, do you think it is a god idea to list them separately but on one line? (e.g. 20% Bosniaks, of which 288 declared Muslim, the other 385 Bosniak) or something similar? Thanks. beztraga (talk) 18:30, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

user:Ithinkicahn

I have rarely encountered such an arrogant editor who quite frankly things too much of himself. He probably considers himself very smart for knowing the term "Serbo-Croatian" which is the reason he's abusing it so fiercely in the context of Bosnian history! I am not really sure what to do, the editor in question is relentless and spends an unhealthy number of hours editing on Wikipedia. The last thing you want is to get into an edit war with him, so stay away from that. I'm not really sure if he knows what kind of controversies he is stirring up. But if we were to look for a central consensus against his edits would you have any ideas? Praxis Icosahedron ϡ (TALK) 05:51, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It appears his revisions are extensive, he's been meticulously reviewing every single Ottoman Bosniak historical figure and bluntly replaced Bosnian with Serbo-Croatian, providing no motivation or argument. Praxis Icosahedron ϡ (TALK) 06:04, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit wars on Lepa Brena and East New Sarajevo

I noticed you were recently doing battle with some anonymous/IP editors. The edit summary exchanges of insults in Bosnian may be educational (and mostly decodable thanks to Google Translate), but unfortunately you are probably once again in trouble with Wikipedia's WP:3RR policy. Please engage in proper dispute resolution practices or you will likely be blocked. Dl2000 (talk) 01:48, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kraj potoka bistre vode for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kraj potoka bistre vode is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kraj potoka bistre vode (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KDS4444^Talk 17:22, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cyrillic

I have been calling all participants in the edit-warring about Cyrillic in Bosnia-related articles to gove their opinion in a attempt to reach consensus. Please express you view at this thread, thank you. FkpCascais (talk) 07:52, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Your recent editing history at Lepa Brena shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Dl2000 (talk) 03:45, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Brena Muslim Nationalist!?

My friend you will be reverted every day for this war propaganda. I know it hurts you because she lives in Serbia and have only Serbian passport, and married to Serb, and kids have Serbian names. Even on Bosnian wiki there is no anything about war in ex-YUG (thay didnt even call her Bosnian)... and you are comming here to tell same propaganda lies about Siege of Sarajevo and Serbs raping and ethnically cleansing Bosniaks!? Give a source where she ever mentioned anything about war and i will stop this edit war.--Bozalegenda (talk) 04:12, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Now i will go to sleep but tomorow i will come to revert your propaganda lies.

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For your article on Čika Mišo, it shows love for your land and its people. Perkohesisht ai i vjetri (talk) 16:52, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Watchlist

Done! Have a good time. Praxis Icosahedron ϡ (TALK) 21:41, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cyrilic (part 2)

There was a discussion about Cyrilic so many times... the only one Cyrilic in BiH is Serbian. I don't give a damn for cities in Federacija, but in Republika Srpska there is only Serbian Cyrilic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.46.228.94 (talk) 01:44, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Talk-page stalker) ... Yes Demir, I invited you to participate in a discussion at WP:Bosnia and Herzegovina, and you didn´t participated. A consensus was reached. If you disturb again the Cyrillic issue I´ll report you. Also, you should thank me for not having patience to report you for your 100 reverts in 2 weeks at Lepa Brena. She is living in Serbia for 30 years now, and you are abusing by adding non-related unsourced content about war and blabla. You are the one saying people proested because of ethnic cleansing and so on, you are the one claimng that, and find a source for it, otherwise stop adding unrelated content to the article. Btw, you accused me of POV? You must be joking... all I noteced is you adding Bosnia, Bosnia, Bosnia, Serbs ethnic cleansing, Serbs war crimes, Bosnia, Bosnia, everywhere... Oh, yes, you created a couple of nice articles, I saw them. Good work. Sorry you don´t contribute positivelly in other articles as well. FkpCascais (talk) 04:04, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I admire your good work on articles related to music but I have to agree with FkpCascais that many of your additions to such articles are unrelated POV materials. Take for example the article on a popular Bosnian pop-folk and turbo folk singer Selma Bajrami and your addition about people who dream of a "[[Greater Serbia]]" are pathetic men with small penises. I politely ask you to please refrain from such actions in future.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 10:22, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please Stop Edit warring on Dubica (Bosnia-Herzegovina) article

Your recent editing history at Dubica (Bosnia-Herzegovina) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. -- Marek.69^talk 18:20, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:DemirBajraktarevic reported by User:Marek69 (Result: ). Thank you. Marek.69^talk 18:27, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reported

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. FkpCascais (talk) 18:29, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of three months for violating WP:3RR at Dubica (Bosnia-Herzegovina) and Lepa Brena. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 18:58, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Page move

Hi Demir. On what grounds was Mehmed-beg Kapetanović Ljubušak moved to Mehmedbeg Kapetanović? I think the former is the name by which the man is most commonly known. Praxis Icosahedron ϡ (TALK) 02:05, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nezir Škaljić, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South Slavic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 23:02, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hayat Production for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hayat Production is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hayat Production until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:32, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Bosnian folk music

A tag has been placed on Category:Bosnian folk music requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:48, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Istok, sever, jug i zapad

The article Istok, sever, jug i zapad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

'Delete' WP:BEFORE reveals nothing of substance other than Discogs and a dead site, which are not sufficient per WP:ALBUM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:20, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Krug (album)

The article Krug (album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability - one source.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Karst (talk) 16:25, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dragana Mirković videography

The article Dragana Mirković videography has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources or indication of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Karst (talk) 16:15, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ljubav kad prestane

The article Ljubav kad prestane has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable sources or indication of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Karst (talk) 22:35, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Izdajnik

The article Izdajnik has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability or reliable references.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Karst (talk) 17:13, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Metak (album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Metak (album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metak (album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Charsaddian (talk) 17:26, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Do gole kože for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Do gole kože is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Do gole kože until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Charsaddian (talk) 17:28, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Žena sa Balkana

The article Žena sa Balkana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NALBUM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 12:49, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]