User talk:Demicx

Welcome!

Hello, Demicx, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few more good links to help you get started:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! I see that you're doing interwikis, but there are some useful links to policies specific to en that you may be interested in. - Banyan Tree 13:13, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Summaries

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labelled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted, so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you.

--Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 22:11, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bosnian WikiProject

Uclani se na projekat koji sam poceo na en Wikipediji: en:Wikipedia:WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina. (Taman ne bio aktivan treba nam korisnika). Prosiri rjec. Hvala, Kseferovic 04:52, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A request for assistance

Would you support the concept of moving the Earhart "myths" to a separate page or article? The reason for my suggesting this is that the main article should be an accurate and scholarly work while the speculation and conspiracy theories surrounding the disappearance of Amelia Earhart are interesting, they belong in a unique section. Most researchers, as you know, discount the many theories and speculation that has arisen in the years following her last flight. Go onto the Earhart discussion page and register your vote/comments...and a Happy New Year to you as well. Bzuk 05:52 3 January 2007 (UTC).

Debate on the correct adjective for Kosovo

Hi! Based on your interest in the Balkans, you may be interested in the currently ongoing debate on whether we should be using Kosovo or Kosovar/Kosovan as the adjective for Kosovo. —Nightstallion 15:21, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eurovision Song Contest 2009

Can you please discuss things on the talk page before making controversial edits, you have made quite a number of them but have so far not been willing to discuss any despite a long ongoing discussion of the issue on the talk page. Discussing things on the talk page, as well as providing an edit summary, is standard courtesy which is appreciated. Please note that continued reverting is considered to be edit warring, even if you do not technically violate the three revert rule. Thank you. Camaron | Chris (talk) 11:10, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am satisfied with the sourcing you have now given, I can't say everyone will be though since use of ESCKaz as a source is controversial. Next time it would be great if you voice your opinion through the talk page as well as through editing. Camaron | Chris (talk) 11:03, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Bosniaks: Images of notable Bosniaks for the Template:Bosniaks infobox

Please, join the discussion.

Regards, --Wusten fuchs 11:52, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]