User talk:Delvethedragon
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Delvethedragon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Xbox (console) special limited editions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Atlantic306 (talk) 20:50, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the welcome, my friend! And thanks for the links; I appreciate them! As for my contributions, no problem! I only wish to help! I hope to see you around. And have a nice day! — Delvethedragon (talk) 21:29, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Category:Grassland plant species of Alabama has been nominated for deletion
[edit]
Category:Grassland plant species of Alabama has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 21:41, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Lists of Plants
[edit]I saw you mention that you were/are thinking about a list of grassland plants for the SE to replace your Category. What about a Flora of Alabama? I'm currently working on Draft:Flora of Colorado. Why? Because that is my place of interest and it gives me a systematic reason to look at and check every species and genus. Even if I don't end up publishing it I'm learning at lot by experimenting with my draft and I'm fixing problems on all sorts of pages I might not have visited otherwise as I build my list.
I estmate I'll be done in about two years at my current rate. MtBotany (talk) 00:48, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- Maybe. I've honestly been busy with other things recently, but we'll see. A list of the Flora of Alabama could be a good idea. Delvethedragon (talk) 00:55, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Delvethedragon If you ever want help with one, let me know. I figured out how to get a list of accepted species out of Plants of the World Online into a table that can then be fairly easily exported to the Wikipedia table format. I've got all the species for Colorado listed now in my draft. Just working on getting all the common names and Nature Serve information into it. MtBotany (talk) 18:15, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Oh, that's pretty cool. Thanks. Although, I think I'd probably prefer to use the Alabama Plant Atlas (APA) for that (it's a local authority which offers an easy way to export a list of plants, which can also be filtered by certain parameters like nativity in the state). POWO is usually pretty good, but sometimes they have some odd claims in their data, like saying that Opuntia is native to Tibet (which it definitely isn't) or disagreeing with most authors and considering Prunus alabamensis a variety of P. serotina, which the APA disagrees with. Delvethedragon (talk) 19:41, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- I entirely agree about the occasional oddness of POWO data. They are, for now, the source we use for species names on Wikipedia but some of their classifications make me quite skeptical. I always put in all the disagreements with POWO from WFA, PLANTS, VASCAN, and FNA when writing individual plant articles.
- It is why I am going over my list using Flora of Colorado by Ackerfield for information about native status and to add in species they missed as well as adding in the NatureServe status. Wish I had a nice easy to use local database. And I still have not figured out how to use the API from NatureServe to get their data into a spreadsheet. MtBotany (talk) 13:55, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
- Oh, that's pretty cool. Thanks. Although, I think I'd probably prefer to use the Alabama Plant Atlas (APA) for that (it's a local authority which offers an easy way to export a list of plants, which can also be filtered by certain parameters like nativity in the state). POWO is usually pretty good, but sometimes they have some odd claims in their data, like saying that Opuntia is native to Tibet (which it definitely isn't) or disagreeing with most authors and considering Prunus alabamensis a variety of P. serotina, which the APA disagrees with. Delvethedragon (talk) 19:41, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Delvethedragon If you ever want help with one, let me know. I figured out how to get a list of accepted species out of Plants of the World Online into a table that can then be fairly easily exported to the Wikipedia table format. I've got all the species for Colorado listed now in my draft. Just working on getting all the common names and Nature Serve information into it. MtBotany (talk) 18:15, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)