Hello, Dejab! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Fabrictramp | talk to me22:14, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Adolph Mongo, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
Seems notable, but this is an unsourced and advertising, I mean, this entry is quite unencyclopedic for a biography.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
I removed the proposed deltion as this individual seems notable enough for an article. However, your original version of the article was not written from neutral point of view, which is one of the five pillars of Wikipedia, our most important core policies. I have tried to clean up the worst of the problems, and have added a reference, but it needs more reliable sources as required by another of our core policies, verifiability. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:53, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've had to revert part of your latest edit to this article. Using hyperbole like "rain maker" and "lightning rod" is not really appropriate, and, again, you provided no source for your statements. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:19, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Adolph Mongo has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \byoutube\.com (links: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jv_nqm1updk). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. Video links are also strongly deprecated by our guidelines for external links, partly because they're useless to people with slow internet connections.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:45, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
