User talk:DeirdreAnne/Archives/2011/06

This page is a chronological archive of past discussions from the current talk page for the period Please specify dates with: {{Chronological talk archive|dates}}.

In order to preserve the record of past discussions, the contents of this page should be preserved in their current form. Please do NOT make new edits to this page. If you wish to make new comments or re-open an old discussion thread, please do so on the current talk page.

If necessary, copy the relevant discussion thread to the current talk page page and then add your comments there.

The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011

Your Military History Newsletter

Project News: From the editors – Contest results, A-class medal recipients
Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content
Editorial: Hawkeye's thoughts on the article writing process

To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:25, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

US National Archives collaboration

United States National Archives WikiProject

Would you like to help improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the National Archives and its incredible collection? This summer, the National Archives—which houses some of America's most important historical documents—is hosting me as its Wikipedian in Residence, and I have created WP:NARA to launch these efforts.

There are all sorts of tasks available for any type of editor, whether you're a writer, organizer, gnome, coder, or image guru. The National Archives is making its resources available to Wikipedia, so help us forge this important relationship! Please sign up and introduce yourself. Dominic·t 15:22, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Masonic bodies

I reverted your edits because the changes were incorrect. I would assume that you have no knowledge of the subject, and that is why there was a problem. For example, apart from the caps error, it was called the "Premier Grand Lodge of England".

"Rightly or wrongly" is also correct - the historical reason for schism was not a definite black or white issue where something was contrary to practice; it was merely a matter of interpretation, and no blame has ever been assigned for anything relating to that period of time.

As to your "not four subdivisions" change, there are two umbrella bodies, both of which are further subdivided into four groups, and that's obvious information from the web pages of both groups.

If you want to edit a specialized article, it is imperative that due diligence be done to verify information before changes are made. MSJapan (talk) 16:34, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]