User talk:Deepak agrawal music

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Deepak agrawal music, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains (talk) 19:19, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hello, Deepak agrawal music. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Jaane Kyun De Yaaron, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. MT Train^Discuss 05:49, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Ammarpad (talk) 20:19, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jaane Kyun De Yaaron, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. theinstantmatrix (talk) 17:16, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Orange Mike | Talk 19:10, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock-spamun|Your proposed DeepakAgrawal|Current username violates Wikipedia username policy Deepak Agrawal (talk) 10:46, 23 January 2018 (UTC) }[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Deepak agrawal music (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I respectfully request that my editing privileges be unblocked. First time i didn't understand about Wikipedia rules. I completely understand the reasons for the block on my account. I understand that my account name was related to the topic I was posting, and that the posting was promotional regardless of my intention. I hereby promise that any posting or edits will not include promotional or advertising nature whatsoever and that my contributions will be to the extent to which that is only verifiable through solid evidence of no dispute Deepak Agrawal (talk) 10:46, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

One unblock request at a time, please. I'm declining this unblock request for two reasons. You were told you would be unblocked only if you intended "to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation", but you have not agreed to this. Additionally, you were told to "Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked." but you have not done this, either. Yamla (talk) 12:07, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Deepak agrawal music (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

hello Sir,i want contribute to the articlees on films on wikipedia.I respectfully request that my editing privileges be unblocked.thank you Deepak Agrawal (talk) 16:39, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Yeah, that's not happening. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:57, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

But... that's exactly the area for which you have a conflict of interest! Are you really sure you've read and understood the policies and notices we've given you? --Yamla (talk) 16:57, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes sir, thank you. Deepak Agrawal (talk) 17:10, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So, just to be clear... You are asking to be unblocked so you can continue to violate WP:COI, and are aware you'd be violating WP:COI? --Yamla (talk) 18:18, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello sir i am music composer I'm not promoting any website of Advertising on Wikipedia.will follow the rules and regulations of Wikipedia. I want to contribute articles from the same films to Wikipedia .... The movie in which my music is.I will only include those movies which will be completely copyrighted. Which will be ready for release and the consent of the copyright holder Deepak Agrawal (talk) 16:23, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jaane Kyun De Yaaron

The article Jaane Kyun De Yaaron has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not sufficiently notable. No award, no full-length reviews from any independent source (one is not enough per WP:NFILM) & have no independent, significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSS ^💬 18:22, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]