User talk:Dedonite

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Dear Dedonite: Welcome to Wikipedia, a free and open-content encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:

Don't worry too much about being perfect. Very few of us are! Just in case you are not perfect, click here to see how you can avoid making common mistakes.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Wikipedians try to follow a strict policy of never biting new users. If you are unsure of how to do something, you are welcome to ask a more experienced user such as an administrator. One last bit of advice: please sign any discussion comment with four tildes (~~~~). The software will automatically convert this into your signature which can be altered in the "Preferences" tab at the top of the screen. I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to tell us about yourself and be BOLD! Baseball,Baby! ^balls^•^strikes 22:49, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Zoo York

I noticed you removed a lot of the content from the Zoo York page while putting in more about the philosophy. I have created two different sections. --Liface 15:27, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, didn't notice the other page. Sorry for the confusion. Remember to source the Zoo York page eventually with reliable sources. Also, remember to sign your comments with (~~~~) four tildes! --Liface 20:43, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well yeah that's true, you can't just say "I lived this, so it has sources" although it would make things a lot easier. Basically a primary source should be a newspaper or magazine article, backed up by secondary sources like websites or other articles. The reliable sources page linked above has a lot more on this. --Liface 06:36, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Miles Browning peer review

I don't know if you noticed, but I submitted this article to the Military History WikiProject for peer review, which has been completed. (It's also linked on the article's talk page; just click 'Show' on the bottom of the infobox.) It has a long way to go before we can submit it as a good article, but it's definitely on its way. I have a couple of reply questions for the peer reviewers after some of their ideas have been implemented, and we can use the article's talk page for discussing ideas and tasks to be done.

I've already done a couple of things suggested in the peer review - I added the article to the Browning DAB page, and I have downloaded the photo, which I'm trying to straighten up a little before uploading it to Wikipedia for use in the article. I've also obtained several photos from the Naval Historical Center, which I'm tweaking and will upload soon.

Since you provided the book quotes, it would be terrific if you could provide page numbers for each of them. As the review says, 50 or more footnotes are not at all unusual for an article this size. If you can't, we'll probably have to remove them until someone can do so. It also needs dates for his major awards, and the 'early life' and introduction need expansion. I noticed that you made even shorter sections out of the 'early life' text today; that's the opposite of what the peer reviewers suggested. I've left it for now, but I think you should reconsider that edit.

I look forward to working with you to get the article to good article status and hopefully to featured article status. Feel free to leave a message on the article talk page (preferred) or my own talk page. Thanks - Baseball,Baby! ^balls^•^strikes 23:12, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Preview, minor edits, edit summaries

As of the time I write this, you've made 43 edits to Miles Browning over a period of four hours, which is way too many for the content you've added and changed. If I don't tell you this someone else will, so here goes.

First, could I ask you to please use the 'Show preview' button instead of saving your work so often? It really makes things difficult for recent change patrollers to have so many edits from one user show up in Special:Recent changes in such a short period of time.
Second, you're not making minor edits, and you should not mark an edit as minor unless it's... well, minor. Minor edits are things like typo fixes, adding commas, and very superficial changes. Changing the text is not a minor edit, and most of your edits today have been marked as minor when they are not.
Finally, please, please, please use the edit summary box to summarize your changes. If you don't (and you're not), editors have to crawl through the history edit by edit to see what changes you've made, which is very tedious. Using edit summaries is common courtesy, and we'd really appreciate it if you'd start.

Thanks very much, and happy editing - Baseball,Baby! ^balls^•^strikes 00:07, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Commander Miles Browning.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Commander Miles Browning.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:05, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Commander Miles Browning.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Commander Miles Browning.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:06, 8 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:06, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Clark H Woodward.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:52, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dedonite. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dedonite. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]