User talk:Dedden
Welcome!
Hello, Dedden, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Karmafist 07:38, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
Image missing source and licence
[edit]Hello Dedden, if you are the uploader of Commons:Image:Matildabethamedwards.jpg to commons, please provide a source of the image and a copyright status. For help see Commons:Commons:Licensing. Thank you. --GeorgHH 10:27, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Did you know...
[edit]--Allen3 talk 12:23, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
William Elliot Griffis
[edit]Dedden -- If you are you the contributor who wrote the following sentence in 2005, can you recall why you chose the term "Westernizing"?
- "In September 1870 Griffis was invited to Japan by Matsudaira Shungaku, for the purpose of organizing schools along Western lines."
User:Iwanafish has just edited that one word -- substituting "modernizing" for "Westernizing." Iwanafish's minor edit to William Elliot Griffis is unimpeachable, of course; but it caused me to wonder. As it happens, this word choice has remained unnoticed for more than a decade.
I checked the edit history in hopes that I might ask you why the term "westernizing" was used rather than "modernizing," but it seems unlikely that you will recall. If you know, perhaps you wouldn't mind explaining your reasoning? Although I can point to no specific citation, I have the impression that Griffis himself would have understood his career in Japan as "Westernizing" -- and perhaps we can guess that others like Sir Rutherford Alcock and Sir Harry Parkes might have thought this term was sufficiently precise.
I myself prefer Iwanafish's word choice. I think "modernizing" is better, but I plan to remain on the look-out for a citation which would support a revert-edit to the use of "Westernizing" in this article and elsewhere. Do you see my point? "Modernizing" ≠ "Westernizing"? --Tenmei (talk) 14:19, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
New Netherland Map
[edit]Hello, Are you the person who created New Netherland map in info box for the article? It's quite good, though I find your choice of "prominent" towns odd since some cited did not exist very long or were actually small. Would like to be in touch with you as to how we could improve that.. In general the whole info box could use improving: ie the B4 and after flag, languages spoken, governors list, etc etc are sometimes incomplete. Have you got time or interest? Me: New Yorker>Amsterdammer, bedoel ik woon in NL (on and off) al jaren, en deze onderwerp is "dear to my heart", especially in light of the 1609-2009 "celebrations", and would like to have people read the real story of my wonderful hometown.Djflem (talk) 05:32, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Dedden. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Dedden. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Anne Rice Award
[edit]Congratulations! | ||
The Anne Rice Award honors editors who have improved Wikipedia's coverage of women writers by creating a biography of a woman writer who, like Anne Rice, used a pen name, nom de plume, literary initials, or pseudonym on the title page or by-line of her works in place of her real name. On behalf of WP:WPWW, thank you for creating the biography on Isabella Fyvie Mayo, who wrote as Edward Garrett. --Rosiestep (talk) 20:41, 11 February 2022 (UTC) |