User talk:DecZXZ

Welcome!

Hello DecZXZ, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. -- Big Dom 17:46, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Turf Moor

Can you please stop adding useless information to the article. This unsourced rubbish has nothing to do with the History of the stadium so there's no need for it. Thanks, -- Big Dom 19:31, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll ask you again to please adding this trash to the page. Cheers, -- Big Dom 17:47, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ewood Park

I see you have reverted my removal of unsourced contentious material at Ewood Park. Wikipedia is not a soapbox. The material I removed might have a place in a fanzine, but not in an encyclopedia. Please discuss the matter at Talk:Ewood Park. Oldelpaso (talk) 14:52, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that I have given you a warning below about your lack of discussion and continual reinsertion of unacceptable material. Please read the links that you have already been given with regards to Neutrality, verifiability and no original research and then engage in discussion before reinstating the material. If you don't then you will be blocked. Woody (talk) 23:24, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page New Grays Athletic Stadium has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tiderolls 20:22, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ewood Park 3RR

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ewood Park. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Woody (talk) 23:24, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a short time for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at Ewood Park. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

- Vianello (Talk) 04:25, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dudesleeper talk 22:54, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop violating wiki policy by deleting entire articles without first discussing it with the author.

This is your second and final warning. - Dudesleeper talk 23:04, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:05, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

	Hello DecZXZ. Replies have been posted to your question at the Help desk. If the problem is solved, please place {{Resolved\|1=~~~~}} at the top of the section. Thank you!
	You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{helpdeskreply}} template.

blocked

I have blocked you for a week for continued edit warring. Academic Challenger (talk) 23:14, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]