User talk:Debunkked

Welcome!

Hello, Debunkked, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Klaus-Haus, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Bonewah (talk) 15:09, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Klaus-Haus

A tag has been placed on Klaus-Haus, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Bonewah (talk) 15:09, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Klaus-Haus

I have nominated Klaus-Haus, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Klaus-Haus. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Cheers! Scapler (talk) 16:34, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Klaus-Haus

A tag has been placed on Klaus-Haus, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. 99.149.84.135 (talk) 16:01, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Klaus-Haus

The article Klaus-Haus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication how this might meet notability guidelines. Lacks any references to reliable sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 16:15, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Klaus-Haus

A tag has been placed on Klaus-Haus, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. 99.149.84.135 (talk) 16:22, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Youtube is not a reliable source, and an obscure reference, your terminology, underscores lack of notability. Please stop re-adding this article without reliable sources. 99.149.84.135 (talk) 16:22, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Klaus2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Klaus2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:52, 16 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 18:52, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Klaus3.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Klaus3.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:52, 16 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 18:52, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Klaus.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Klaus.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:53, 16 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 18:53, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've noted the "hangon" tag you placed on the above-captioned article. I also note, however, that the article in question was deleted after an articles for deletion process, a record of which is found at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Klaus-Haus, and thus articles on this topic become subject to immediate deletion (just as the tag on the article notes). I have therefore decided to agree with the individual who tagged the article for deletion, because I see no changes in the contents of the article that would lead me to believe that there is any significant difference from the article that was deleted about two weeks ago; there are certainly no reliable sources that I can see, which was the problem the first time. If you wish to return this article to Wikipedia, I recommend that you investigate and embark on the process known as deletion review; note that discussions at Deletion review are always based entirely on Wikipedia policy references. Best of luck with your future contributions. Accounting4Taste:talk 19:29, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Given the comments you've made on the article's talk page, I also suggest that you have a look at the definition of reliable sources for future reference; the significance of events like this has to be asserted by arm's-length, third-party experts writing in reputable publications like books, magazines and newspapers. Accounting4Taste:talk 19:31, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of our conflict of interest policy and notability guidelines. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text

{{unblock|I don't understand why I was blocked. I have nothing to do with the event that I created the page for. I'm simply a fan. The event is completely free and by word of mouth invitation only, so this is in no way an advertisement.}}

below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. ~ mazca ^talk 21:03, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|I honestly don't understand why I was blocked. I have nothing to do with the event in question; I am simply a fan. The event is completely free and by word of mouth invitation only, so I don't even think that this can in any way be considered advertisement. Klaus-Haus is a cool event that defies the established norm... I was surprised that it was not on Wikipedia, so I decided to add it; I had no idea that it would cause such a fuss. I had been trying to find credible sources (as discussed in the comments page) all afternoon to add to the article when I discovered that had been blocked. Once I had found some additional info and pasted it on the page, if the article was still found unreliable by Wikipedia, I would certainly not have contested the page's deletion or tried to put it up again.}}

I've been involved in this chain of decisions and thus must recuse myself from considering this block, but it seems to me that this individual is trying to work in good faith within Wikipedia's boundaries. S/he is not likely to be successful, in my opinion, but that's entirely another matter. Accounting4Taste:talk 22:13, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)The article was deleted via the usual process at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Klaus-Haus, with several perfectly valid reasons why it was deleted. Nevertheless, Debunkked saw fit to recreate the article three more times without any further demonstration that the concerns raised have been rectified, or any evidence of reliable source coverage. When someone has that level of insistence of putting an article up despite opposition based on Wikipedia policy, I generally conclude that they are there to advertise the subject. While this may have been an incorrect conclusion here, I hope you can see where I'm coming from.

If Debunkked will agree to cease reposting this article until such a time as he can create and point to a draft of it in userspace (eg at User:Debunkked/Klaus-Haus) that demonstrates its notability, then I don't have an issue with any admin unblocking here. ~ mazca ^talk 22:17, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I certainly do see where you're coming from; I rather thought I had SALTed the title to prevent its being recreated for a month while the user pursued deletion review (as I recommended above) and was not aware that it had been recreated after my deletion. I think deletion review is a good solution but yours also offers the user a chance to work within our boundaries, for which thank you. I have been too involved in this matter to close it myself but will be fine with any decision by any admin, including reversing my SALT. Accounting4Taste:talk 22:31, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I created the article once. It was my first article, so I was learning Wikipedia as I went. I didn't know any of the processes to follow. When I discovered that it was deleted, I concluded that I needed tangible proof, so I searched for images to put up. I created the article a second time, with intend to expand it to meet guidelines, but even before I was able to figure out how to post a picture on wikipedia, the article was deleted! I created it a third time, having just discovered the "speedy deletion contesting" option, and began putting up the pictures that I had gathered from a few friends, stuff up on their blogs, etc. hoping that this would add the credibility that was missing.

I was exchanging with someone in the discussion section of the article, trying to figure out how to make the article eligible an valid, when the next thing I knew, it was deleted and I was blocked... that's the part I did not understand. I tried as best I could to work within the boundaries of Wikipedia. I thought this whole thing a bit excessive... especially for a subject matter that clearly does not benefit anybody directly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.98.57.37 (talk) 14:52, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:KlausHaus 2001.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:KlausHaus 2001.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:12, 17 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 00:12, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:KlausHaus 2002.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:KlausHaus 2002.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:12, 17 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 00:12, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:KlausHaus 2003.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:KlausHaus 2003.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:13, 17 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 00:13, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:KlausHaus 2004.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:KlausHaus 2004.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:13, 17 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 00:13, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:KlausHaus 2005.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:KlausHaus 2005.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:13, 17 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 00:13, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:KlausHaus 2006.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:KlausHaus 2006.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:13, 17 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 00:13, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:KlausHaus 2007.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:KlausHaus 2007.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:14, 17 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 00:14, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:KlausHaus 2008.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:KlausHaus 2008.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:14, 17 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 00:14, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]