User talk:Deborah12345

The page IMP³rove has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be blatant advertising which only promotes something, and which is unlikely to be suitable for an article (or at best would need a fundamental rewrite). Wikipedia is not a medium for promotion of anything, whether a company, product, group, service, person, religious or political belief, or anything else. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:37, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Benchmarking

Category:Benchmarking, which you created, has been nominated for discussion (+ several others). If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Syrthiss (talk) 13:11, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of IMP³rove for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article IMP³rove is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IMP³rove until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Syrthiss (talk) 12:45, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you mean by "the article had been approved". This article was removed as a result of the deletion discussion mentioned above. L Faraone 15:37, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article was most certainly not 'approved'. In my discussion with Deborah12345 on my talkpage, I raised the same point with her (that NawlinWiki did not 'approve' except perhaps in the 'didnt delete and lock the page' sense) and told her explicitly that I was going to restore it and nominate it for deletion. In the meantime two brand new editors arrived at the talkpage for the article and commented. However, her continued strident calls that the page was deleted in error seems deceptive in intent. I have salted the page with no prejudice to its recreation through a proper afc process. Perhaps if Deborah12345 studied the English language more and marketing buzzwords less she would have a better grasp of nuance. Syrthiss (talk) 13:32, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]