User talk:Deboinhidef

Welcome!

Hello, Deboinhidef, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Chrisd87 09:45, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Muthafuckin pirates

A tag has been placed on Muthafuckin pirates, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Chrisd87 09:45, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Muthafuckin pirates

A tag has been placed on Muthafuckin pirates, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. WebHamster 00:37, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Miley Stewart. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NrDg 22:05, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Miley Stewart, you will be blocked from editing. NrDg 22:10, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Miley Stewart. Thingg ^⊕^⊗ 23:00, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is, in fact, like Soviet Russia. It seems like "the people's encyclopedia", but really the despotic admins ruin perfectly good edits

Not really. Your reputation for disruptive editing precedes you, unfortunately. We do assume good faith generally but after [1] (unreferenced), [2] (pure vandalism) and [3] (anti-christ) the general assumption of good faith has been sorely tested so a major change to the article, [4], has not been given a really serious examination as to whether or not it improved the article. Others just saw major removal of content with an apparently weak justification by an editor with a poor reputation. I note you have posted a comment to User talk:Thingg who issued the last warning message. He may wish to re-evaluate it - it looks like a good faith edit to me. It may still be reverted by others who disagree with your reasoning. You might wish to post a message on the article talk page to discuss what you wish to remove from the article and why and work to gain support from other editors. --NrDg 04:32, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Hipiscool.jpeg

The file File:Hipiscool.jpeg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal photo. Out of scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 01:54, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]