User talk:Debdove

March 2017

Paul did not believe in hypnosis his second wife did and the man that wrote the book about paul was sleeping with her so there's your liable book source. And we are in touchwith family and paul never came to his father as its states here...and he did not pass as it says here he caught pneumonia

MY HUSBAND LIVED THE ABUSE SAW PAUL SLEEP WITH OTHER MEN SO YES HE IS A LIABLE RESOURCE AND MY HUSBAND LARRY DOVE IS STILL ALIVE

This is ridiculous when you have personal experience you are told you are a liar but yet a person who wrote a book after the man is dead has more credibility thats a joke

• @Debdove: please take a look at one of our policies: WP:OR. Thanks. ProgrammingGeek ^talktome 18:03, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

We're not calling you a liar. We are just saying we need reliable sources for anything you add to the article, because we have no way of independently verifying what you are adding. Everything on Wikipedia needs to be verifiable to ensure that nobody can add false information to articles. Alex Cohn (let's chat!) 18:06, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

I AM THE WIFE OF THE GRANDSON OF PAUL "WILLIAM DOVE" SOLOMON SO YES HE AS MORE PERSONAL EXPERIENCE THEN YOU HAVE TO THIS MANS PERSONAL LIFE

• Hello, @Debdove:

On Wikipedia, regardless of personal experience, information cannot be added to an article without a reliable source. Please provide a source before adding information. Thanks! ProgrammingGeek ^talktome 17:56, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm ProgrammingGeek. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Paul Solomon— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ProgrammingGeek ^talktome 15:08, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Paul Solomon, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Tompop888 ^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:46, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

== Debdove, you are invited to the Teahouse! ==i am the wife of pauls grandson so yes he has PERSONAL experience comapred to thise that do not know him...

Hi Debdove! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:06, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Paul Solomon.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Having "personal experience" with the subject is no substitute for reliable sources. If you provide sources then you may change content. Otherwise, please gain consensus on the article's talk page. ProgrammingGeek ^talktome 16:38, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Paul Solomon. Serols (talk) 17:49, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:13, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

August 2017

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Paul Solomon.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. You have already been blocked for this once. Source these accusations or leave this alone. Meters (talk) 19:47, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alex Shih^Talk 17:17, 30 August 2017 (UTC)