User talk:Debate Scholar

September 2016

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to United States presidential election debates, 2016. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:48, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Since posting the above message, I have seen more of your edits to the article, and it now looks very much like trolling. You may be blocked from editing by an administrator if you continue in the same way. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:52, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Challenge

Consider becoming a positive participant and collaborator instead of a disruptive vandal. The challenge is to create, not deface. Your edits have no possible chance of remaining in the article...but they show potential. You have chosen "Entertainer" as your way of sharing yourself with the Wikipedia experience and, so, your contributions are rightfully deleted ASAP. Editors that choose "Educator" have a better chance of survival. It's completely up to you. Buster Seven Talk 13:09, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Refrain from repeated vandalism

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C0:A680:CE00:647A:9CD:2AB6:FBA7 (talk) 13:15, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 13:26, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. De728631 (talk) 13:27, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@De728631: Since I don't fancy getting desysopped for wheel warring right now, can we get a consensus on whether to block for 12 hours or indefinitely? Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 13:29, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've just posted at ANI, please reply over there so the community can witness the decisions. De728631 (talk) 13:37, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]