Speedy deletion of "Three chimneys"

A page you created, Three chimneys, has been tagged for deletion in accordance with our deletion policy. In particular, it meets one or more criteria for speedy deletion; the relevant criterion is:

No context. Very short articles with little or no context for their statements.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

If you have any questions, please contact an administrator for assistance. Thank you J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 00:25, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Three chimneys. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 00:53, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Deathaxe359 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am a noob and I didn't know I was going to not be able to edit anymore. I mean, Wikipedia is pretty much just for editing and I thought that this wouldn't even happen. Please, please, please, please let me get unblocked. I just made this account and I always want to be on wikipedia now. I promise that is I ever vandalize again, you guys can block me forever. Please. Wikipedia is soooo fun and I love it. I am always on the computer and I have been looking on websites and I finally found I website that I can look up up to date facts edited by millions of people every day. I love this website and I will love to be unblocked and get back to regular things. I promise that I won't vandalize or do anything that is bad for wikipedia again.

Decline reason:

Your contribution history does not include any evidence that your unblocking would be likely to improve the encyclopedia; indeed, all of your edits appear to be vandalism of one sort or another. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 03:22, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock reviewed|1=I have just registered for wikipedia and I skipped the rules so i didn't know. I would like to be unblocked because I am devoted to make a contribution to wikipedia and all of its registered, reliable members. I would like to be unblocked and will never vandalize wikipedia again. If I do vandalize wikipedia again, I promise that I will not request to get unblocked and not sign up for wikipedia to keep those bad ways from ever touching wikipedia again. In conclusion, please unblock me.|decline=As above, there is no evidence that you intend to be a serious contributor. Please see the "second chance" message below if you would like to demonstrate otherwise:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Deathaxe359 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have just registered for wikipedia and I skipped the rules so i didn't know. I would like to be unblocked because I am devoted to make a contribution to wikipedia and all of its registered, reliable members. I would like to be unblocked and will never vandalize wikipedia again. If I do vandalize wikipedia again, I promise that I will not request to get unblocked and not sign up for wikipedia to keep those bad ways from ever touching wikipedia again. In conclusion, please unblock me.

Decline reason:

As above, there is no evidence that you intend to be a serious contributor. Please see the "second chance" message below if you would like to demonstrate otherwise: Your request for unblocking has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
- If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas.
Click edit this page on that article and scroll down past the message informing you of your block.
Copy the source of that article and paste it to the bottom of your talk page under a new top-level heading (like this: = Article title =)
Propose some significant and well researched improvements to your article by editing your personal copy of the article.
When are you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{helpme|your question here}}" to your talk page. Thank you. — B (talk) 04:44, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Although you can make a second request for unblock, you may not delete the first one; reviewing admins prefer to know whether they are reviewing a request for the first time or not. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 04:14, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Deathaxe359 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I request for a unblock because my 9 year old brother got on to an account and vandalized wikipedia so now my whole family can not get on wikipedia and also somehow that block has messed up other accounts I have on other websites and I want to see if I can get this block unblocked so I can access my other website accounts. Please respond and/or lift the block before 12:00am March 27, 2008.

Decline reason:

This block cannot affect accounts on other websites. It also does not affect you reading Wikipedia. If other Wikipedia accounts are autoblocked due to this block, please request unblock with them as per the instructions in {{autoblock}}. — Sandstein (talk) 06:21, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock| {{autoblock}}.

May I be perfectly clear?

The next time you remove reviewed unblock requests from this talk page and make another unblock request, I will take away your ability to edit this talk page. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:59, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How can you do that — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deathaxe359 (talk • contribs)

Administrators have the ability to protect a page from being changed. From reading your latest message, it looks like you are saying that you have an account of your own. Please put an unblock request there, giving the autoblock ID number (it will be a number like #876543) and, provided that you have a positive contribution history there, the autoblock of your IP address will be removed. --B (talk) 15:37, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused... this block isn't an autoblock, it's a direct block on a vandal-only account. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:39, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

From reading his second unblock message, it sounds like he is saying that other family members have their own accounts and they are now autoblocked as a result of the block against this account. I could be misunderstanding him, though. --B (talk) 16:25, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think that's just the usual 'my brother did it, it's not my fault!' that vandals always use, but if other members of the family have accounts, those are the accounts that should have the autoblock lifted at their request, which I guess is what you said. I doubt that there are any real collateral-damage accounts, though- notice that he also claims that being blocked is preventing him from viewing unrelated web sites. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:31, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Deathaxe359 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want you to understand that my younger brother did get onto my computer and did vandalize wikipedia. I DIDN'T DO THAT. Look, I have an autofill form, so he went straight to the website and logged on and didn't need my password. Please understand. Now believe me, I DIDN'T VANDALIZE WIKIPEDIA. I can get a picture of my brother and show you it for proof. I hope you're the kind of person everyone says you are. I hope you are.

Decline reason:

Your contributions history shows that you just tried to impersonate an adminsitrator by pasting their signature over edits you just made to this talk page, giving the false impression that an administrator supported unblocking you. That is outrageously disruptive, and not likely to get you unblocked. Do anything like that again, and this talk page will be protected.--Jayron32.talk.contribs 05:16, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I DIDN'T DO THAT

I am telling you and if you don't believe me than fine but I am telling you that I have a little brother and he has hacked onto my account. I have set my browser to automatically spell my name password. He put that thing on because he is such a jerk. I can get him to talk on the phone with you if I have to because you should believe me when I say the truth. Wikipedia is the best website ever. I even set it as my homepage. I am devoted to help wikipedia and when you unblock me, I am going to change my password and set my browser to not type my password for me. As a use-to-be wikipedia editor on my other account which name is pupster21 and that account has not been touched in a long time.