User talk:Ddvir/sandbox

Looking good

Hey Danielle! I've been looking at the Maroon page and seeing what you have been working on over here, and I've got to say, I like your sources and what you are contributing to this topic. Initially, I was worried that you might encounter difficulty on expanding on a page that already appears substantial, but my concern was misplaced. You definitely bring important sources to this page, and I appreciate the facts that you are contributing to the topic. When you add your contributions to the existing page, be sure to visit the talk page and let them know what you've added and why! I'm sure you're already aware, but I just want to make sure you put a nice bow on things... Also, I don't think you're having any issues with language or bias or sounding like you are building an argument, I know when we talked in person you were worried about this. It seems like you have a good grasp of when to introduce a line of thinking that belongs to a source, and you do not misattribute this thinking by presenting it as your own. Rock on, see you in class in a few hours :P

Dp153344 (talk) 10:03, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

I'm back, I didn't give you enough credit on expanding on a page that already looked done. Seriously, kudos, mad props, this is beautiful stuff. I remember initially being impressed that the original maroon page had a section for etymology. Little did I know that you would be expanding upon this great section with some really cool information! I love it! Keep up the good work, Wikipedia needs you [and so do I for future information!] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dp153344 (talk • contribs) 10:08, 5 December 2017 (UTC)