User talk:Ddave2425

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Ddave2425, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Literaturegeek | T@1k? 11:28, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Your recent edit to the page Paroxetine appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any other tests that you may do and take a look at the welcome page, if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. You were warned in edit history that your edits were not accurate and not representing the source. [See http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Paroxetine&diff=287824882&oldid=287824146]. Literaturegeek | T@1k? 11:04, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Paroxetine. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Literaturegeek | T@1k? 11:06, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Paroxetine. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. It has been pointed out multiple occasions on admin notice board, on article talk page about the problem of your source. Literaturegeek | T@1k? 01:26, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Paroxetine, you will be blocked from editing. Literaturegeek | T@1k? 08:48, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Paroxetine. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Literaturegeek | T@1k? 01:59, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppets

You have been accused of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mwalla. Thank you. Tiptoety ^talk 02:59, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]