User talk:Ddaann2

Welcome to Wikipedia from Legion fi

Hi, Ddaann2. I welcome you to Wikipedia! Thank you for all of your edits. I hope you like editing here and being part of Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); when you save the page, this will turn into your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or put {{helpme}} (and what you need help with) on your talk page and someone will show up very soon to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Legion fi (talk) 08:58, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

About Derkovits Gyula article

Hi, looking at your contribution history for the Derkovits Gyula and Gyula Derkovits articles, it appeared to me that you wanted to make a redirect. I went ahead and redirected Gyula Derkovits to Derkovits Gyula. You can see what redirecting means by clicking in the links. Also, as a collateral result of the redirect, if you want to update the articles you just have to edit one of them. If you prefer the redirect to be done in the opposite way, tell me so and I'll do it for you. Also, it would be nice if you could add some sources to the article. Thank you and happy editing. --Legion fi (talk) 09:04, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I linked the English article to the Magyar article. You can check out how it is done by looking at the history of the article.--Legion fi (talk) 09:23, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for block evasion by iaaasi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Sandstein 14:39, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You may not evade blocks by creating new accounts. Instead, you must request the unblock of your blocked account using that account. Sandstein 14:40, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My old talk page was blocked, so I can't request my unblock there. Please read the message I posted on your talk page and check my edits http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Ddaann2. I am here to make constructive edits(Ddaann2 (talk) 14:43, 16 March 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Then the only venue left to you for requesting an unblock is making an e-mail request to the Arbitration Committee or the blocking admin, using your original account. Sandstein 14:45, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am quite new on wikipedia and I don't know the procedures. And the blocking admin did not asnwer my messages. Please check my edits on this account. All of them were constructive. May I not get a second chance?(Ddaann2 (talk) 14:48, 16 March 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Message for Squash Racket

Reply for:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Toddst1#Request

If that was not the criterion why did You revert my edits about M.Corvinus? What was wrong about them?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ddaann2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

can u please unblock me? i made only constructive edits http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Ddaann2

Decline reason:

Because you are a blocked user, you are not allowed to edit Wikipedia. Creating new accounts to avoid your block is a very good way of making sure that you will never be welcome at Wikipedia. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:06, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hunyadi

"He had risen from small beginnings; son of a lesser noble of Vlach origin" Macartney, C. A.: Hungary - A Short History http://www.hungarian-history.hu/lib/macartney/macartney06.htm

"Although some Hungarian historians have tried to disprove that the Hunyadi family was of Vlach (Wallachian) origin, the overwhelming evidence supports the view that they indeed were not Magyars, but rose in the service of the Hungarian king, received nobility, intermarried with Magyar noble families, and thus rose to prominence." http://www.hungarian-history.hu/lib/transy/transy05.htm

"Even though Biondo knows of the Rumanian descent of János Hunyadi" http://www.hungarian-history.hu/lib/chk/chk01.pdf

"a Magyarized Romanian from Transylvania, János Hunyadi, became regent of Hungary." Ronald D. Bachman, ed. Romania: A Country Study. Washington: GPO for the Library of Congress, 1989 http://countrystudies.us/romania/8.htm (neutral source)

"a petty Transylvanian nobleman of Romanian descent, Hunyadi" Babinger, Franz. et al. Mehmed the Conqueror and His Time. Princeton University Press. 2nd Edition. 1992. page. 20 (neutral source) http://books.google.com/books?id=PPxC6rO7vvsC&pg=PA20&dq=#v=onepage&q=&f=false

"it may be taken as proved that the family of Hunyadi was of Rumanian origin" Catholic Encyclopedia http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07564b.htm (neutral source)

"It is hardly coincidental that the mass ennoblement of Romanian cnezes is linked to the name of János Hunyadi, for this great general had grown up among them and understood their aspirations" http://mek.oszk.hu/03400/03407/html/84.html "History of Transylvania" and is written by "INSTITUTE OF HISTORY OF THE HUNGARIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES".

"hunyadi was a descendant of a Vlach(Romanian) noble family" http://books.google.ro/books?id=SKwmGQCT0MAC&printsec=frontcover&dq=A+History+of+Hungary++De+Peter+F.+Sugar,P%C3%A9ter+Han%C3%A1k,Tibor+Frank&cd=1#v=onepage&q=&f=false] A History of Hungary‎ Peter F. Sugar, Péter Hanák, Tibor Frank - History - 1994 page 63 (Hungarian source)

"Hunyadi[...] was born a Romanian" The realm of St. Stephen: a history of medieval Hungary, 895-1526 - Pál Engel,Pal Engel,Andrew Ayton,Tamás Pálosfalvi http://books.google.hu/books?id=vEJNBqanT_8C&printsec=frontcover#v=snippet&q=romanian%20hunyadi&f=false (Hungarian source)

"it may be taken as proved that the family of Hunyadi was of Rumanian origin"

Catholic Encyclopedia http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07564b.htm (neutral source)

"It is hardly coincidental that the mass ennoblement of Romanian cnezes is linked to the name of János Hunyadi, for this great general had grown up among them and understood their aspirations"

http://mek.oszk.hu/03400/03407/html/84.html "History of Transylvania" and is written by "INSTITUTE OF HISTORY OF THE HUNGARIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES". —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iaaasi (talk • contribs) 12:37, 8 January 2010 (UTC) (hungarian source)[reply]

"hunyadi was a descendant of a Vlach(Romanian) noble family"

http://books.google.ro/books?id=SKwmGQCT0MAC&printsec=frontcover&dq=A+History+of+Hungary++De+Peter+F.+Sugar,P%C3%A9ter+Han%C3%A1k,Tibor+Frank&cd=1#v=onepage&q=&f=false] A History of Hungary‎ Peter F. Sugar, Péter Hanák, Tibor Frank - History - 1994 page 63 (Hungarian source)

"His father, Voyk was a Romanian noble"

Engel, Pal. Realm of St. Stephen : A History of Medieval Hungary, 895-1526. London, , GBR: I. B. Tauris & Company, Limited, 2001. p 283 http://books.google.com/books?id=vEJNBqanT_8C&pg=PA454&dq=Engel,+Pal.+Realm+of+St.+Stephen&ei=b_qgS66YLoTANrCirccH&cd=1#v=onepage&q=Engel%2C%20Pal.%20Realm%20of%20St.%20Stephen&f=false

Not to talk about Romanian history books

Martina Hingis

remove bad link "Famous Hungarians". University of Pécs. http://www.pecsmedicaluniversity.info/famous-hungarians.asp. Retrieved 2007-09-07.

Karol Hingis

http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/martina+hingis

Friendly note

You've spent a lot of time adding links to this talk page. It's time that is wasted, since your repeated violations of the rules mean that you aren't going to be the person to add this information, or any other information, to Wikipedia. You really have broken too many rules for us to allow you to edit at all. If this information is truly important, it's inevitable that someone else will eventually add it, but you seem not to understand that you really are blocked from editing the encyclopedia at all. You've created so many sockpuppet accounts that it's very unlikely that you'll ever find an admin willing to unblock you, or at least, not until several years have passed without any more edits from you. You've tried often enough that you know now that any accounts you make will be blocked, and the changes you want won't be made by you. I think it's time to stop wasting your life on this, don't you? Think of what you could have accomplished with the time you've spent on Wikipedia making edits that weren't kept. You could have learned another language, or how to play a musical instrument. You could have fallen in love and gotten married, or read all of Shakespeare. How much more time will you waste before you pursue the beautiful adventure that is your life? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:16, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Corvinus_old.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Corvinus_old.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 05:14, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Statuie1902.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Statuie1902.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 05:17, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Statuie1902.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Statuie1902.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 23:54, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]