User talk:Dd5567

Speedy deletion nomination of Sunday as shurab

Hello Dd5567,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sunday as shurab for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Blythwood (talk) 17:20, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Hello, I'm Blythwood. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sunday as shurab has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Blythwood (talk) 17:20, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Fahad Al-Bishi has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Fahad Al-Bishi was changed by Dd5567 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.941047 on 2016-03-04T13:55:45+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:55, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at User talk:Blythwood, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. —SMALL JIM 14:03, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain on how it was a personal attack.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Fahrenheit 451, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 14:15, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 09:58, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Fahrenheit 451, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Fahrenheit 451 was changed by Dd5567 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954742 on 2016-03-09T10:01:35+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:01, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ClueBotNG i hate you make a mistake willmyou

March 2016

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Fahrenheit 451, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Blythwood (talk) 10:04, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

YipB19

Yes, help would be great, thanks! Just tell me what you want to help me with. :D — Preceding unsigned comment added by YipB19 (talk • contribs) 10:20, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 10:39, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/dd567

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/dd567, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Blythwood (talk) 10:39, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]