User talk:Dctrzl/2016

Welcome!

Hello, Dctrzl, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! 22:58, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

License tagging for File:BUS logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:BUS logo.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:06, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Medical Translations

User:Dctrzl thanks for signing-up and expressing interest in helping with translations and integration. Sorry I missed you in January - better late than never. I help the project by coordinating some of the translation efforts. On of our current sub-projects is the 23 vaccines considered essential medicine by the World Health Organization. In Ukrainian, there is a need to improve this content. Do you have time to help?

We have summary files with the basic vaccine facts we want available on a wiki here (scroll down). Click the DATE not the article title (which is the full article, not a summary). For something like, diptheria you could greatly improve the content within the disease article or create a new vaccine article (I encourage using the Content Translation tool - ask me how if you are unfamiliar) with a wikilink.

You could start here to see the missing vaccine articles (but always check the disease article since vaccine content is often sufficiently included there).

We track the project's successes. So, please notify me if you are translating medical content. Thanks, --Lucas559 (talk) 16:49, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have already translated several articles relating to medicine: International Trauma Life Support, American College of Surgeons, National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians, James K. Styner, Mobile army surgical hospital (US), Fenethylline, etc. My knowledge on the topic of vaccination is inadequate. I am interested in anesthesiology, intensive care, toxicology, trauma, military medicine and will try to help the project within capabilities. -- Dctrzl (talk) 21:16, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Myrotvorets

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

By the way, the last time you hid your revert with a false edit summary: [1]. --Moscow Connection (talk) 07:46, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Moscow Connection, sorry you could form such an impression. Dctrzl (talk) 08:10, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please add this part back to the lead section:

The website is affiliated with the government law-enforcement and intelligence agency [[Security Service of Ukraine]] (SBU)<ref name="thedailybeast20160512" /><ref name="ibtimes20160513" /> and the Ukrainian [[Ministry of Internal Affairs (Ukraine)|Inferior Ministry]].<ref name="rt20160512" />

By the way, since in this edit [2] you deleted the part I put back in the lead section, the action can be qualified as another revert from your part. Also, it again looks like a false edit summary. --Moscow Connection (talk) 09:31, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Moscow Connection, it is a repeat and it humiliates Ukrainian governmental organization. --Dctrzl (talk) 09:38, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a repeat. It is reliably sourced. --Moscow Connection (talk) 09:40, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've just searched the page and I have found where it was repeated. (I don't think it should be in the "Activity" section, though. But I will think about it.) --Moscow Connection (talk) 10:11, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Myrotvorets, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages LPR and DPR. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Myrotvorets 2

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

Stop your attempts to add the same stuff over and over. It is called disruptive editing and edit warring. --Moscow Connection (talk) 20:23, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Moscow Connection, someone removes the information again. Agree to delete more information about the version of murder, but the tribunal must leave. For objectivity. And on this will finish? --Dctrzl (talk) 20:31, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't agree. The website is completely unrelated, why mention it? The suggested similarity between these two sites is an original research. (And, by the way, the stuff about the other site being advertised on Novorossia Today is an original relsearch cause there are no reliable sources that would say that.) --Moscow Connection (talk) 20:44, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

talk, Site engaged in similar activity on the other side of the conflict. Also disclosed personal data of citizens of Ukraine. The comparison is not mine. [3] or [4]. -- Dctrzl (talk) 20:59, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, these sources are better. But I still think that the other site shouldn't be mentioned cause it is not notable. (For example, I hadn't heard about it until you added a link to it to the article.) It is probably some minor project, while Myrotvorets is advertised on the state level and has been in the news since the very beginning.
And the article is about Myrotvorets... I think that you want to mention another site simply because you want to show that the other side of the conflict does the same thing and therefore the Myrotvorets website is not so bad... I still think the other site it's inrelevant. If you insist I can advise you to start a discussion on the matter on the talk page of the Myrotvorets article and then ask for a third opinion here: Wikipedia:Third opinion. --Moscow Connection (talk) 21:34, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Moscow Connection, I don't know why you did. Maybe you had not interested in this issue. That's quite credible data indicating the relative popularity of this resource: Russian federal military channel "Zvezda" Donbass People governor. –– Dctrzl (talk) 21:59, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, it seems like it's not something unknown. TV Zvezda is a popular TV channel.
(By the way, the link here [5] doesn't work. Did the "Tribunal" website change its address since 2015?)
Could you please start a discussion about this on the Myrotvorets talk page and then ask for a third opinion as I suggested earlier? Cause still,
1. The only source that mentions both together is Obozrevatel.ua and it simply quotes a Twitter post by Gubarev: [6].
2. The four sentences that you are trying to add are ungrammatical and contain an original research. And the last time you attempted to add them to the lead section. Information about other websites has absolutely nothing to do there.
3. You have already made the article unreadable at times. If you ask for a third opinion, the person who comes will probably copyedit it. (It desperately needs a copyedit.)
4. This is not the right place to discuss the matter. The right place should be on the "Myrotvorets" talk page where more people will probably see it now and in the future. --Moscow Connection (talk) 00:00, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wings Phoenix, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page UAH. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]