User talk:Dcsipcs

August 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies was changed by Dcsipcs (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.886289 on 2016-08-30T05:51:10+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:51, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declare any connection

Hello, Dcsipcs. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 06:35, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome to raise any issues with the article content on the talk page. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 09:53, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry. You are continuing to make edits to the page, and not using the talk page to raise any issues you have. If you persist, I am afraid I will have to report it to the administrators. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:39, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dcsipcs, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Dcsipcs! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

September 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 11:38, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ARBIPA notification

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Kautilya3 (talk) 11:38, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

hi everyone

I am trying to update info for IPCS. This page has not been updated for long and I am doing it on behalf of IPCS. please do not revert changes. if any doubt the institute can be contacted.

Dcsipcs (talk) 11:48, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Respectfully, please inform IPCS is that Wikipedia is not their property, and they cannot change it. If they have any issues with the content, they can write on the article's talk page here. Your edits to the page are against Wikipedia policy and any further edits by you will be taken extremely seriously. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 12:02, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

hi thanks for updating...please change Ruhee Neog designation as Director. -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dcsipcs (talk • contribs)

You need to provide a reliable source for that. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 14:35, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 10:51, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

hi

we plan to make changes in IPCS wiki page and make it more updated. Please let us know if any one has issues. if needed i can put the material here before updating....

Dcsipcs (talk) 11:32, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]