User talk:Dcrajula

Welcome!

Hi Dcrajula! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! 331dot (talk) 09:58, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I’d need your help in keeping the pages relevant and useful Dcrajula (talk) 10:24, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that Wikipedia does not censor spoilers for released films/TV, see WP:SPOILER. 331dot (talk) 09:58, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on HIT: The Second Case. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 331dot (talk) 14:32, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how the plot of the film should be written, but again, please read WP:SPOILER. Wikipedia does not censor plot summaries for spoilers. Please discuss how the plot should be written on the article talk page. 331dot (talk) 14:34, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to keep the movie experience better for the movie lovers. It’s absolutely fine to use the relatives that revealing the entire plot Dcrajula (talk) 14:38, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not concerned with the movie experience of movie lovers. If a movie lover doesn't want the plot spoiled, they shouldn't read the Wikipedia article about a film until they have seen it. Wikipedia does not censor spoilers. Instead of edit warring, please discuss how the plot should be written on the article talk page(Talk:HIT: The Second Case) if you have specific issues with how detailed the plot summary is. You may also wish to read MOS:FILMPLOT, which says " every important event in a film should be outlined without censoring details considered spoilers, and without the use of disclaimers or "spoiler warnings". 331dot (talk) 14:42, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not editing to change the entire story or anything. All I am trying to do here is to keep the information in a sensible manner. Thank you Dcrajula (talk) 14:46, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Dcrajula reported by User:331dot (Result: ). Thank you. 331dot (talk) 14:48, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at HIT: The Second Case. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 14:57, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]