User talk:Dcowboys3109
Welcome!
[edit]
|
April 2007
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Randall chesler. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. PureRED - Kyle Floyd 02:01, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Trap Starz Clik
[edit]I have nominated Trap Starz Clik, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trap Starz Clik. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. 9Nak (talk) 15:41, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
March 2007
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you may not know that Wikipedia has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did in Homosexuality, makes it harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Cambrasa (talk) 09:09, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Probation notice
[edit] Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, Climatic Research Unit hacking incident, is on article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at Wikipedia:General sanctions/Climate change probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.
The above is a templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you. Hipocrite (talk) 19:27, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
- ...and in other news, this[1] is a reasonable edit but just to let you know, the folks on that page have been debating this ever since the article was written - how to mention the term "Climategate", where, in what context, whether to make that an alternate title or the main title of the article, etc. You can see some of that debate on the talk page and in the archives of the talk page. I don't think the issue is really decided, but it's sure generated a lot of talk. Hope that helps, - Wikidemon (talk) 23:53, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
Warning
[edit]You appear to have broken 1RR on an article on 1RR probation. I suggest you go and self revert quickly. --BozMo talk 23:56, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
There is an edit notice of this probationary measure that appears whenever you edit that article. Your edit here reverted to text added two hours earlier, and your edit here four hours later restored the same text. In accordance with the policy on edit warring, I have blocked you for 24 hours. When this expires, please take care to discuss such issues at Talk:Climatic Research Unit hacking incident#Compromise on "Climategate" in lead or elsewhere at that talkpage. - 2/0 (cont.) 02:32, 12 January 2010 (UTC)