User talk:Dcoffeychaput

This is Dcoffeychaput's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 11)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Dan arndt was: undefined

Dan arndt (talk) 04:59, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dcoffeychaput! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 04:59, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Dcoffeychaput/sandbox

Hello, Dcoffeychaput. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 08:43, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Leading Women

Adding spammy advetorials for the services of this organisation kinda makes it more likely that the article will not go anywhere diff. The section you added is *clearly* in the wrong place in the article, even if the text was not largely marketing-speak. I make the not unreasonable assumption that you have a WP:COI with this organisation & suggest you have a quick read of that page. --Tagishsimon (talk) 10:11, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Tagishsimon: I have made contact with this editor off-wiki and a search for their real name suggests they do not have any conflict of interest or association with Leading Women, and are simply an inexperienced editor trying to write an article. Please assume good faith. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 12:24, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]