User talk:Dchittur

Your submission at Articles for creation: International Professors Project (February 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kikichugirl was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:International Professors Project and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— kikichugirl ^speak up! 08:58, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Dchittur, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — kikichugirl ^speak up! 08:58, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Taranik (February 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

/almost ready. Remove a few of the adjectives ,and add citation data for his major publications. The stand you need to set is <WP:PROF>

You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:James Taranik and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 09:12, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Taranik has been accepted

James Taranik, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Joseph2302 (talk) 20:32, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Our content policies are clear

The policies are clear. When content has been challenged, it may NOT be restored without an inline citation to a Reliably published source. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:16, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There IS a dispute over the dates as is clear by the fact that they have been removed multiple times with the edit summary stating that they have been challenged. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:39, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And you did finally reach my actual page. and as you can see, I am not blocked as I am writing here. the other pages are sock puppet impostors have been blocked. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:39, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Dchittur. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Ashenai (talk) 20:36, 6 September 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Dchittur. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Ashenai (talk) 20:45, 6 September 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Dchittur. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Ashenai (talk) 20:56, 6 September 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Hello, Dchittur. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Dchittur. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Ashenai (talk) 22:01, 6 September 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

I replied on my talk page!

Hi again, and thanks for your detailed description of events! I replied, at my talk page! --Ashenai (talk) 00:11, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My edits to James Taranik

You're very welcome! I know there's a lot to learn (I still have lots to learn myself, even after editing for years) but you seem to have the right approach: look to see how other editors have done things, and don't be afraid to use the Teahouse. I'm very glad looking at the examples of citations I did has helped you to understand how they work. Keep at it, and you'll get the hang of it! —GrammarFascist (talk) 18:57, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:International Professors Project

Hello, Dchittur. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "International Professors Project".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 19:57, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]