User talk:Dcfc adelaide

Tom Koutsantonis edits

It is not noteable, nor is it sourced. Please cease adding it. Timeshift (talk) 00:07, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hansard does not establish noteability. It fails WP:WEIGHT and WP:NOTE, and i'll be going higher up to ensure it is removed and stays removed. Timeshift (talk) 01:26, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We'll see. Timeshift (talk) 02:38, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Special:Contributions/Dcfc_adelaide. May I ask exactly what vendetta it is that you have against Tom Koutsantonis? You don't edit any other articles. Timeshift (talk) 06:36, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SOAP. Any contributions to that page that are similar to your previous edits will be reverted. You obviously aren't here for any purpose other than to vandalise his article, so save your time and stop contributing, if you aren't going to produce genuine contributions. Timeshift (talk) 06:14, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 03:03, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Please stop adding controversial biographical content from non-reliable sources to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Orderinchaos 03:27, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hansard is a primary source, and does not establish the noteability of the issue. Orderinchaos is an admin, he is very much aware of wikipedia policies, and trust me, he is violating none. Good-day. Timeshift (talk) 06:18, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't do any work in politics thankyou, you really should assume WP:AGF, but as you're not, i'll accuse you of having a WP:COI for insisting such a trivial event be added. It hasn't made news, it is not noteworthy. It doesn't matter if it happened or not. It is like adding to his page what he had for lunch just because hansard reveals it. I have contributed to wikipedia for over 2 years, I have all SA and federal politicians on my wikipedia watchlist, and would remove that sort of trivial garbage no matter which side of politics it has been added to. Timeshift (talk) 06:28, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Hamilton-Smith

The image you uploaded has been marked for deletion as no source has been provided. Timeshift (talk) 23:46, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Martin Hamilton-Smith.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Martin Hamilton-Smith.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:58, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Continued WP:POV on Tom Koutsantonis

Your repeated violations of wikipedia policy are not welcome on wikipedia. If your style continues I will take this up with admins which may see your IP address banned from wikipedia. Timeshift (talk) 03:23, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Read WP:POV. Your contributions are full of it. I hope you find something better to do with your time than add it to wikipedia pages. You know your contributions are WP:POV but if you don't want to admit it to others, I can't make you. Timeshift (talk) 08:37, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Meh. This is becoming tedious. You are a hack. Dcfc adelaide (talk) 09:48, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If I was a hack why would I add something like Foley's abuse toward Xenophon at Kevin Foley? Or add info about the 50/50 Newspoll at Mike Rann? Or the referendum confusion at Next South Australian state election? I am balanced. Your edits show you are the hack. Not I. Timeshift (talk) 10:22, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]